Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts Businesses Google Transportation Technology Your Rights Online

Uber Must Provide Waymo With Data Regarding Its Otto Acquisition, Rules Court (thetechportal.com) 32

An appeals court today has ruled that Anthony Levandowski, the Uber executive accused of taking documents from Google's Waymo, can't use the Fifth Amendment to prevent Uber from turning over documents in the case. "The court has now directed Uber to provide data associated with its Otto acquisition to Waymo," reports The Tech Portal. From the report: Following the case, Levandowski invoked the fifth amendment, so as to prevent any other information which could implicate him from coming to the surface. Meanwhile, Waymo has been claiming that Levandowski and Uber signed an agreement with each other just a few days after the former quit his job at Google. The company has also asked Uber to provide it with a log containing details of the cab aggregator's legal involvement with Levandowski. Levandowski has been opposing the motion, stating that it would violate his fifth amendment. However, a new court ruling has quashed these hopes. With this ruling, Waymo can technically also request Uber for a copy of the due diligence report. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said: "Mr. Levandowski argues that he is entitled to relief under the Fifth Amendment because production of the unredacted privilege log could potentially incriminate him. We are not persuaded that the district court erred in its ruling requiring defendants to produce an unredacted privilege log."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Uber Must Provide Waymo With Data Regarding Its Otto Acquisition, Rules Court

Comments Filter:
  • That is some first-class word salad right there.

  • by mutantSushi ( 950662 ) on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @07:13AM (#54304011)
    We believe Uber should not have to provide this information. We already uninstalled the app, so any more information would be a violation of our privacy. ...Ooops...
  • by mysidia ( 191772 ) on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @08:36AM (#54304231)

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said: "Mr. Levandowski argues that he is entitled to relief under the Fifth Amendment because production of the unredacted privilege log could potentially incriminate him.

    The privilege log is a DOCUMENT.
    Since when did the 5TH Amendment apply to Documents or other Tangible written evidence, Ever?

    As far as I know, if you commit a crime and write something about it in your private diary, then Yes, the police ARE allowed to use it against you, and you can be prosecuted in court based on this evidence. Hell..... they can even use it against you if you make a note about it on your smartphone and secure it with a passcode. Courts have ordered people to hand over their passcodes.

    So why would the guys at Uber think this would go any differently than the well-established standard that once a piece of information is made into a tangible form, whether written to a piece of paper, Or saved to a hard drive, the 5th amendment does not protect the medium from seizure, analysis, and compulsory decryption if necessary to access the info, And the 5th amendment no longer protects the information once recorded?

    • http://www.slate.com/blogs/fut... [slate.com] It's still in courts and depends on your district.
      • by rtb61 ( 674572 )

        They can force you to hand over the phone, the problem is there is no legal way to force some one to remember something because if you legitimately forget or for any reason lacked the knowledge, then would in fact be slowly but surely psychologically torturing you to death with an infinite jail sentence for refusal to comply with the impossible.

  • by H3lldr0p ( 40304 ) on Wednesday April 26, 2017 @09:12AM (#54304401) Homepage

    fucking itself over as of late but I didn't realize it had moved on to fucking itself over using a baseball bat with rusty nails sticking out of it.

  • To recap: Uber hires ex-googler. Google sues. ex-googler does everything possible to make sure Uber looks bad and loses the lawsuit.

    Consider this: what if Levandowski is conspiring with Google to fuck over Uber? Waymo is pretty much dead. Everyone else -- Uber, Tesla, GM, Ford, even fucking Chrysler -- is ahead of them. So here's the real timeline:

    Uber approaches Levandowski about laundering some documents. Levandowski talks to Larry Page about it (not enough attention is being paid to this conversati

    • by Anonymous Coward

      I don't think you know very much about the industry.

      "Waymo is pretty much dead... even fucking Chrysler -- is ahead of them."

      Chrysler's driverless car program *is through* Waymo. And Waymo has a pile more road hours and proven functionality than any of the competition. Your conspiracy theory seems pretty far-fetched, although of course nothing's impossible.

Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!

Working...