Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Crime Bitcoin Government The Courts United States

Ross Ulbricht Faces New Drug Charges 102

Alleged Silk Road mastermind Ross Ulbricht now faces additional drug-related charges. Ars Technica gives a run-down on the run-down, and shows an array of driver's licenses that can't look good to a jury: According to a 17-page amended indictment filed late Thursday night, the government introduced one count of “narcotics trafficking,” of “distribution of narcotics by means of the Internet,” and of "conspiracy to traffic in fraudulent identification documents." Previously, Ulbricht was indicted in February 2014 on four formal criminal offenses: narcotics trafficking conspiracy, continuing criminal enterprise, computer hacking conspiracy, and money laundering conspiracy. Ulbricht pleaded not guilty to the previous charges, and he seems likely to plead not guilty to the new ones as well.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ross Ulbricht Faces New Drug Charges

Comments Filter:
  • Guilty (Score:3, Interesting)

    by digsbo ( 1292334 ) on Sunday August 24, 2014 @07:02PM (#47744095)
    Of facilitating voluntary transactions between consenting adults.
  • More litigants! (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 24, 2014 @07:07PM (#47744111)

    So if I buy a cell phone at Walmart and the battery catches on fire I can sue Walmart too? How about the cashier at Walmart and all of the stock people? They all share responsibility!

  • Re:Define torture (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 24, 2014 @07:26PM (#47744207)

    Well if you define it that vaguely, I guess any sort of punishment at all is torture, and I am guilty of some kind of war crime if I ground my 13 year old daughter.

  • Re:Chokehold (Score:4, Interesting)

    by digsbo ( 1292334 ) on Sunday August 24, 2014 @07:29PM (#47744231)
    Nope. I'm opposed to the war on drugs, and I have no problem with Big Tobacco, so long as they do business honestly. In my opinion, as long as they don't lie, I don't even think they should be prevented from various advertising, or need to have safety warnings on their cancer sticks.
  • Re:Chokehold (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Canth7 ( 520476 ) * on Sunday August 24, 2014 @07:49PM (#47744323)
    Exactly. Do I have a problem with Big Tobacco? Yes - because they lie about their products and refuse to disclose the ingredients cointained within their products. Otherwise, I have no problem with multinational companies that want to sell tobacco, cocaine or heroine.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...