Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Government The Courts United States Your Rights Online

Activist Group Sues US Border Agency Over New, Vast Intelligence System 83

Posted by samzenpus
from the lets-see-what-you-have-there dept.
An anonymous reader writes with news about one of the latest unanswered FOIA requests made to the Department of Homeland Security and the associated lawsuit the department's silence has brought. The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has sued the United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in an attempt to compel the government agency to hand over documents relating to a relatively new comprehensive intelligence database of people and cargo crossing the US border. EPIC's lawsuit, which was filed last Friday, seeks a trove of documents concerning the 'Analytical Framework for Intelligence' (AFI) as part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. EPIC's April 2014 FOIA request went unanswered after the 20 days that the law requires, and the group waited an additional 49 days before filing suit. The AFI, which was formally announced in June 2012 by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), consists of "a single platform for research, analysis, and visualization of large amounts of data from disparate sources and maintaining the final analysis or products in a single, searchable location for later use as well as appropriate dissemination."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Activist Group Sues US Border Agency Over New, Vast Intelligence System

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Why oppose this? (Score:4, Informative)

    by AHuxley (892839) on Monday July 21, 2014 @07:14PM (#47504315) Homepage Journal
    The US tried that for a very short time under Nixon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]. A massive movement of staff to secure the border was in place and worked very well.
    The flow of drugs, drug money laundering in US banks and illegal labor was at risk. Over time the US returned to a policy that can be seen today.
    A free flow of people, goods and the need for expensive financial instruments ensures wonderful regional profit.
    The UK was a great example too with its visa "expires" database. The UK forgot how/why to count visa in and visa out (was International Passenger Survey).
    The main reason seems to be a super cheap flow of workers and the UK will try and bring back "exit checks" in a year or so :)
    As for US policy - cheap workers with no on site wage or health laws was always the big win to keep wide open boarders for decades.

"The only way I can lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy." -- Louisiana governor Edwin Edwards