Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Crime Security United States News

Man Behind Hacks of Bush Family and Other Celebs Indicted In the US 65

Posted by Soulskill
from the bet-you-wish-you'd-stood-in-bed dept.
New submitter criticalmass24 writes: 42-year-old Marcel Lehel Lazar, better known as Guccifer, the hacker that gained unauthorized access to email and social network accounts of high-profile public figures, has been charged in the United States. According to the Department of Justice, "[F]rom December 2012 to January 2014, Lazar hacked into the e-mail and social media accounts of high-profile victims, including a family member of two former U.S. presidents, a former U.S. Cabinet member, a former member of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, and a former presidential adviser. After gaining unauthorized access to their e-mail and social media accounts, Lazar publicly released his victims’ private e-mail correspondence, medical and financial information, and personal photographs. The indictment also alleges that in July and August 2013, Lazar impersonated a victim after compromising the victim’s account." The full indictment can be read online.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Man Behind Hacks of Bush Family and Other Celebs Indicted In the US

Comments Filter:
  • by korbulon (2792438) on Friday June 13, 2014 @11:01AM (#47229945)

    Having complete strangers being able to pry into all your personal data and intercept your private communications.

    Why there oughta be a law, mister. There really should.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by chinton (151403)
      Two wrongs... etc, etc, etc...
    • So should OUR private info receive similar handling by unauthorized people, would the justice system give the same consideration or is this just for high ranking figures such as the Bushs.

      Yeah I know the answer. But asking the question as I believe we would have minimal justice for the same crime against everyday people if we were lucky.

  • by Opportunist (166417) on Friday June 13, 2014 @11:04AM (#47229975)

    If you want to invade the privacy of people and sniff through their most intimate of details, get a job with the government.

    • by i kan reed (749298) on Friday June 13, 2014 @11:24AM (#47230141) Homepage Journal

      Yes, there's a number of things the Government retains a monopoly on, by intent. Argument by hypocrisy doesn't make sense for criticism of the government*.

      "Want to forcibly enter people's homes? Get a job with the government."
      "Want to kill another human being? Get a job with the government."
      "Want to demand money from another person? Get a job with the government."

      These are normal behaviors practiced by parts of every government in the world(except maybe Lichtenstein, the Vatican, etc). Now I'm all for shutting all the bullshit the NSA does down, and wish our democracy was better engineered to allow that, but the structure of the argument you're using is absurd.

      *I know it's a joke, this post is more directed at the people modding it insightful, as if this is some meaningful argument.

      • by Opportunist (166417) on Friday June 13, 2014 @11:32AM (#47230223)

        The difference is maybe that a legitimate government does all that with a warrant and oversight. You know, where a judge has to ponder whether it's ok to violate someone's privacy. The older ones here may remember the time when we had a government like that.

        • I get that. I made it clear I support that notion. I am simply saying that this argument in favor of the correct conclusion is fallacious.

          • I had a completely different read on Opportunist's post. The "want" turns it into an indictment on the moral character of government officials involved in such activities. In other words, it's not about the government reserving rights to certain activities but rather about the perceived low moral character of those in charge.

            Those activities may sometimes be necessary, but wanting to do them is sick.

            • by Opportunist (166417) on Friday June 13, 2014 @01:19PM (#47231049)

              With a job like this, your moral integrity becomes crucial, at least in my opinion. You are given a LOT of power. You may do what others may not do. You are granted permissions that others don't get for good reason, because it is easy to abuse them and it is hard to prove that abuse. NOT abusing such power in such an environment takes a pretty high personal morality.

              "Liking" and "wanting" something is not per se a problem. The reason WHY you like and want to have a job like this, is. Personally, I love hacking. It's fun and rewarding to outsmart a server's logic and to outwit the programmer who came up with its locks. It's interesting to pit your mind against that of the admin trying to secure it. It's not a moral question whether you like breaking a server's security. The moral question is where you do it and what you do when you succeed. The "good" moral way is to do it on machines you have the permission to, and to stop the moment you broke the lock. The "bad" way is to do it on machines you don't have permission for or to not stop and sniff through the files you just opened up. Essentially, to force an analogy with doors and locks, do you stop when the door is open and tell the owner who asked you to test whether his lock can keep someone out that he should get a better lock (preferably with a few tidbits of information what to look for in a good one), or do you first take a trip through his (or her, depending on your preference) underwear drawer?

              Likewise, I don't think that wanting to join a force where you might at some point get to invade someone's privacy is a problem itself. The question is why you want to join such a force. Because you want to outsmart a criminal, or because you want to sniff through the private belongings of anyone, criminal or not.

              • I think it's interesting that you got modded up for repeating my post. I guess I wasn't explicit enough.

              • Forgive me for being emphatic, but NO you stupid shithead, MORAL INTEGRITY is not a FUCKING PROBLEM you fucking IGNORANT SHITHOLE.

                Warrants, and oversight, these are the check on abuse of power. Not the difference between "want" and "like" or even "think".

                The "good" moral way is to do what you have permission to do. Not to stop once you break the lock. If you do anything else, you are guilty in at least half of the existing countries of some form of trespass. In the good old US of A, you are guilty if you

                • Sorry, but I cannot agree. The motivation why someone does it does make a big difference for everyone affected by it. Even without overstepping any legal boundaries I can tell you from personal experience it does make a LOT of difference whether a policeman's motivation is him wanting the law to be upheld and him wanting to "teach someone a lesson", i.e. give in to his sadistic nature. A lot in the interaction between policeman and suspect is based on very subjective impressions, and hence the results may v

    • by Jahoda (2715225)
      You are painfully insightful here on this, but just because they do it doesn't make it ok for him to have done this. Regardless of what I feel about some of the people involved, it is reprehensible to invade the personal effects of another person. It's a low life, scummy thing to do.
  • by Xenna (37238) on Friday June 13, 2014 @11:05AM (#47229989)

    Kind of a counter-NSA. If they can read our mail why shouldn't we read theirs? I can't help feeling a tingle of sympathy.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by war4peace (1628283)

      That won't help much, he got sentenced to 3 (or 4? Can't recall and I am lazy) years in jail already in Romania, same as some very rich asshole who stole literally millions EUR and now is over a billion EUR wealthy. What's worse is that the rich dude was found guilty in 3 different trials (for bribing and kidnapping to name a few offenses) and they "merged" the sentenced into one, basically saying, you got 3 years there, 4 years there and 4 more years there, so let's sum that up and make it... 3.5 years tot

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward

        Hacking some e-mail addresses with no data leaks gets you 3-4 years. Stealing millions of EUR, plus kidnapping some people, plus trying to bribe some football teams to "lose" a match gets you the same sentence. And people say there's justice in this world. Pfft.

        While I agree that there is some disparity between the punishments mete out between those two crimes, it says right in TFS that "Lazar publicly released his victims’ private e-mail correspondence, medical and financial information, and personal photographs." If that doesn't count as a data leak, then please explain to us what does.

        • Sorry, I meant "for personal gain" and forgot to add it to my post. My mistake.
          While I certainly don't agree to his practices, the guy was basically "snowdening", and I also think that the punishment is appropriate. But if that is an appropriate sentence, then the other is a joke.

          We have to point out lack of consistency in the justice system at every turn.

  • by Apothem (1921856) on Friday June 13, 2014 @11:22AM (#47230129)
    Where can we find the data he leaked? Obviously he was trying to expose something. I figure at the bare minimum it'd make for an interesting read.
    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Obviously he was trying to expose something.

      Obviously you don't understand the nature of cracking.

      For as much as we see these guys with that stupid mask on talking about making a change the truth is that most of them couldn't be bothered to miss an afternoon of football or a WoW raid to lift a finger. Most of the crackers I've known do it for the LuLz. Some have had a bit of ideals behind them but the most talented crackers I've known seem to be detached from what happens in the real world

      • but the most talented crackers I've known seem to be detached from what happens in the real world outside of what they directly come in contact with daily.

        So, basically, they're exactly like the vast majority of everybody else....

    • by halivar (535827)

      This is the guy that leaked GWB's paintings, isn't it? IIRC that was the only interesting thing he found in THAT account, at least.

  • So Disappointing (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Wonko the Sane (25252) * on Friday June 13, 2014 @11:24AM (#47230151) Journal
    As I was skimming Slashdot I saw a headline that contained "Bush" and "Indicted" and I thought it was for war crimes. My first thought was, "I hope they get Obama too" but sadly, it was not to be.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      That's the beauty of the two party scam... one hand washes the other. These guys will never pay for their crimes.

  • These celebs are basically babes in the wood when it comes to internet and security. They are surrounded by a bevy of flunkies, sidekicks and minions who do all their day to day things, their ability to do simple normal day to day things has diminished to the point of being non existent. So they choose the date of their election or zip code of their hometown as the passwords, or congratulate their own cleverness for choosing "prez" or "senator" as the password.

    Hacking their accounts is like stealing candy from the babies. But with one big difference. They have access to the top government and law enforcement officers. They get miffed and they can pull strings. They are babies with mighty mom, the government. Best not to go anywhere near them.

    Also let us not be complacent ourselves. IEEE left a cache of their decrypted passwords in a public folder accessible via ftp server for a month or so. Some member found it and they eventually closed the hole. But the analysis of passwords chosen by the professional electrical and electronic engineers was chilling. 12345 was the most common one. Closely followed by 123456. Simple run of digits formed some 25% of all passwords used by these people.

    Pass word selection ability of people seems to be pathetic.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      > But the analysis of passwords chosen by the professional electrical and electronic engineers was chilling.

      To be fair, there isn't much personal risk in getting your IEEE account hacked. I use dumb passwords on dumb sites too because the effort of keeping track of a hard password is more than the effort in dealing with a breach on a site like that.

    • Pass word selection ability of people seems to be pathetic.

      And?

      My door is super easy to kick in too. So what? That's why we punish such things, instead of requiring everyone to live in a fort.

  • The real news (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Charliemopps (1157495) on Friday June 13, 2014 @11:40AM (#47230305)

    If my email gets hacked is the federal government going to extradite someone from Europe to charge them?
    The real story here is special treatment for special people. For some reason the department of justice thinks the invasion of privacy of political and media elites is a worse crime than the invasion of the general publics privacy. It's so transparent it's laughable.

    • Re:The real news (Score:5, Informative)

      by Joe Gillian (3683399) on Friday June 13, 2014 @12:15PM (#47230533)

      I get what you're saying, but in this case it sounds like the Romanians arrested him first for hacking the emails of a member of the European parliament from Romania, probably to keep him leaking any sensitive information he might've seen. In fact, the article states that Lehel had hacked the Bush family emails in 2013 and had publicly taken responsibility for the hack after he leaked the information, and the government didn't care. To me, it sounds like the US Government only got involved because of Colin Powell. Powell was indirectly involved in the hack on the Romanian MP, in that emails between him and the MP were found and leaked. Powell is currently on the board of directors of Salesforce.com, which is an S&P 500 index stock and publicly traded.

      If he happened to get any non-public information regarding Powell's company, that could easily cause real monetary damages and would probably constitute wire fraud, which they indicted the hacker on.

      The government also said (in the article) that they don't know whether they'll try to extradite him or not. Right now, all they've done is indict him, and as every law professor will tell you, "A grand jury would indict a ham sandwich."

      • by tchdab1 (164848)

        Dan Rather knows what happens when you try to out Bush family secrets. I wonder if Lazar's trigger for prosecution in the US was the same.

  • by fulldecent (598482) on Friday June 13, 2014 @11:57AM (#47230429) Homepage

    Speaking on behalf of Slashdot, the nerds and computer enthusiasts, we ask:

        "How did he get caught?"

  • The bigger crime was exposing W's horrid art to the world.

The clearest way into the Universe is through a forest wilderness. -- John Muir

Working...