BlackBerry Sues iPhone Keyboard Maker Typo 226
judgecorp writes "Typo Products, which makes a physical keyboard for the iPhone 5 and 5S is being sued by BlackBerry. The firm — co-founded by media personality Ryan Seacrest — provides an iPhone case which includes a physical keyboard, whose keys are sculpted very like those of a classic BlackBerry phone. 'From the beginning, BlackBerry has always focused on offering an exceptional typing experience that combines a great design with ergonomic excellence. We are flattered by the desire to graft our keyboard onto other smartphones, but we will not tolerate such activity without fair compensation for using our intellectual property and our technological innovations,' said Steve Zipperstein, BlackBerry’s General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer."
Obviousness (Score:4, Insightful)
They shamelessly copied the look of the BlackBerry keyboard. So what. The design of a QWERTY keyboard isn't an original work of authorship, nor is it nonobvious, nor are QWERTY keyboards associated with BB in the minds of members of the public.. No copyright, no patent, no trademark.
Case dismissed.
BB should buy the thing if it has any money left.
If you can't innovate, litigate... (Score:3, Insightful)
Blackberry is dying. If their only move is to sue people trying to imitate their "exceptional typing experience," then the death knell isn't far away...
Re:All I can say to that is... (Score:5, Insightful)
Apparently he's a celebrity. Wikipedia says he's a radio personality and hosts a show called American Idol.
I had to look it up too.
Re:If you can't innovate, litigate... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Do those things actually sell? (Score:5, Insightful)
I used to be like that as well (although never liked the BlackBerry keyboards). Swype on Android changed my mind in a big way.
Patent? (Score:4, Insightful)
The article doesn't clarify if BlackBerry patented the keyboard layout and set up, and whether the patent is still in effect.
If so, they are well within their rights to enforce it. Typo Products can probably work out a deal with them, et tutti contenti.
If the patent has expired, or if it was never granted/never filed... suck it, BlackBerry. You should know better.
Cheers!
Re:Hmm, that reminds me of something... (Score:5, Insightful)
They keyboard IS something special, and IS subject to a patent. Is blackberry going to rise from the dead? no. Are they entitled to control the use of their design? I think so. The Typo is clearly a "distinctly blackberry keyboard for your iphone" which isn't really "fair"
Re:Do those things actually sell? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Do those things actually sell? (Score:0, Insightful)
Yeah... For me it was the same with sex. After 30 seconds, I didn't have an orgasm, so I just gave up on sex.
More seriously, you are an idiot.
Re:All I can say to that is... (Score:5, Insightful)
Well for ages, Blackberry owners were raving about the quality of their keyboards, on how easy it was to type on such a small keyboard. Blackberry spent a lot of money and R&D to come up with that style, which also meant a lot of engineers got paid to do such work. Now just because blackberry is unfashionable it doesn't mean that a third party company and just go and steal their ideas. especially after Blackberry put the patent on it.
I know slashdotters have I HATE PATTENTS mind set. But this isn't a software patent which is covered by Copyright law and Patent law, this is a hardware patent, of a physical invention. Where blackberry deserves credit for their design.
Re:All I can say to that is... (Score:2, Insightful)
this is a hardware patent, of a physical invention. Where blackberry deserves credit for their design
I would say that you are prejudging. The extent to which the look and feel of a keyboard can be protected by patent must be established by the courts. By the way, note: six keys on the bottom versus four.
Re:All I can say to that is... (Score:3, Insightful)
Spending a bunch of money on R&D does not magically make something non-obvious. I'm not saying a court will necessarily determine that Blackberry's "invention" was obvious (because this seems to happen pretty rarely), but I am saying that I think that the concept is obvious, even if the specific implementation is not.
Yes I think it's important to do research to figure out how big the keys on a keyboard of size X need to be. I also think it's important that a hammer has a handle of the right diameter. If Stanley spends $1 million to determine the perfect handle diameter for a hammer, I still don't think it makes sense to allow Stanley to have a patent for hammers with handles of that diameter.