Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government The Courts Transportation United States

Gov't Puts Witness On No Fly List, Then Denies Having Done So 462

cathyreisenwitz sends word of a San Francisco trial in which the U.S. government appears to be manipulating the no-fly list to its advantage. The court case involves a Stanford Ph.D. student who was barred from returning to the U.S. after visiting her native Malaysia. She's one of roughly 700,000 people on the no-fly list. Here's the sketchy part: the woman's eldest daughter, who was born in the U.S. and is a U.S. citizen, was called as a witness for the trial. Unfortunately, she mysteriously found herself on the no-fly list as well, and wasn't able to board a plane to come to the trial. Lawyers for the Department of Justice told the court that she simply missed her plane, but she was able to provide documents from the airline explaining that the Department of Homeland Security was not allowing her to fly.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Gov't Puts Witness On No Fly List, Then Denies Having Done So

Comments Filter:
  • I'm readying popcorn (Score:5, Informative)

    by MiKom ( 866143 ) on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @05:57PM (#45601553) Journal
    Judge presiding over this case - William Alsup. The one who threw away Oracle Java APIs lawsuit agains Google.
  • No popcorn yet (Score:5, Informative)

    by Okian Warrior ( 537106 ) on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @06:01PM (#45601635) Homepage Journal

    Don't get out your popcorn just yet. From the article:

    But Judge Alsup noted that the document with the DHS instructions to the airline was not supported by any sworn testimony or evidence of its authenticity. “You have to have a sworn record before I can do something dramatic.” Judge Alsup said he would consider the document if and when Ms. Mustafa Kamal arrives in San Francisco and can testify as to its authenticity.

    Ms. Pipkin said that Ms. Mustafa Kamal was reluctant to spend the money on another airline ticket to San Francisco without some assurance that this time she would be allowed to board her flight.

    “Get her on an airplane and get her here,” Judge Alsup responded. “She’s a U.S. citizen. She doesn’t need a visa. I’m not going to believe that she can’t get on a plane until she tries again. ” And Mr Freeborne, with disingenuous faux-solicitude, claimed that the government is “willing to do whatever we can to facilitate” Ms. Mustafa Kamal’s ability to board a flight to the U.S.

  • Re:Ah yes... (Score:5, Informative)

    by Sique ( 173459 ) on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @06:23PM (#45601953) Homepage
    You could dig through the links and actually find the evidence [recapthelaw.org].
  • Re:No popcorn yet (Score:5, Informative)

    by jfengel ( 409917 ) on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @06:27PM (#45602033) Homepage Journal

    He's saying that he doesn't believe the contention that she is on the no-fly list. The government denies that she's on a no-fly list. The document that claims she was comes from an airline, not from the DHS itself, so it's possible that the reason she was denied boarding comes from further down the line.

    She's reluctant to try again, since the flight isn't cheap (and they didn't refund her money). The airline is blaming DHS, and that's the part I'm not sure how they'd go about proving. They'd need to prove that the order they claim came from the DHS actually came from the DHS. I don't know what channel the message was delivered to them, so I don't know how they'd authenticate it, and the fact that DHS usually operates in secrecy makes it that much harder.

    If I read it correctly, she doesn't have to try again, she simply needs to get Malaysia Airlines to cough up their source for the document they provided. I've got no idea how easy that would be.

  • by wizkid ( 13692 ) on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @06:30PM (#45602083) Homepage

    Alsop is the Judge. One of the few good ones left. He'll probably Fillet the DOJ and serve them up for lunch. Unfortunately, the DOJ will appeal when they don't get their way.

  • Re:No popcorn yet (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @06:45PM (#45602327)

    If you are on the US no fly list you are also banned from flying to Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean.

  • by erroneus ( 253617 ) on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @06:50PM (#45602399) Homepage

    Question: Does the judge have the authority to command an army of paramilitary police with ACTUAL assault weapons and armored vehicles? The DoJ does.

    Another question: Despite the courts ruling that the Washington DC ban on firearms was unconstitutional, the law continues to be enforced. What weight does a judge's ruling have any longer?

    The government (the executive) follows the law when it's convenient. It breaks the law when the law is inconvenient. And no one is interested in countering it.

  • by Sique ( 173459 ) on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @07:09PM (#45602639) Homepage
    U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Zoe vs. Williams (1982).
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @08:23PM (#45603397)

    No, he's been charged with possession of drugs AND a firearm, in VIRGINIA, Not DC. "Kokesh was originally arrested July 9 after a police search of his suburban Washington home in Herndon, Virginia, found a firearm and an illicit drug, an illegal combination in the state of Virginia."

    Also this guy is the son of the guy who owns Dakota Rifles.

  • Re:Southwest.. (Score:5, Informative)

    by mr100percent ( 57156 ) on Wednesday December 04, 2013 @11:21PM (#45604613) Homepage Journal

    The US DID intern Arab-Americans in the week after 9/11, in mass roundups and arrests, and almost all of them were later released without charge nor apology. Then the government began a series of interrogations, fingerprinting, and in many cases deportation [nytimes.com] proceedings in 2002 for thousands of Arab and Muslim green card holders and immigrant families.

If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some.

Working...