Microsoft: We Offer Up User Data To Law Enforcement 2 Percent of the Time 54
Nerval's Lobster writes "In its second announcement of the kind, Microsoft revealed [Friday] that it received more than 37,000 requests for information on customers of its Skype, Azure and other services from law enforcement agencies around the world. The count does not include requests made using "National Security Letters" issued by the FBI or other U.S. federal agencies that have the force of a warrant or subpoena, albeit without the oversight or control provided by the courts that issue those sorts of orders. During the first six months of 2013, Microsoft received 37,196 requests that covered a total of 66,539 customer accounts. The company refused to provide any information in response to 21 percent of those requests. It provided "non-content data" in response to 77 percent of the requests – non-content data usually includes information such as names or basic subscriber information rather than information on the content of messages or other details describing online activity of those customers. In 2.19 percent of cases, however, Microsoft reports having provided "customer content data" – which includes the content of messages or data stored in accounts owned by Microsoft companies. Ninety-two percent of requests for customer content came from U.S. law-enforcement agencies."
MShafted (Score:5, Insightful)
Stop this artificial distinction of 'metadata' (Score:5, Insightful)
What the summary actually says is that they offer up user data to law enforcement 77% of the time.
Note the wording. (Score:3, Insightful)
I've never heard the expression "customer content data" before. It seems to exclude metadata, which is one of the major things that the NSA spectacle is about.
Basically, given the things they cannot say anything about (even to deny), it's fairly clear that Microsoft is handing everything over to the NSA (which isn't a law-enforcement agency, you'll note) using an automated mechanism. Probably one that the NSA constructed themselves, having access to everything Microsoft has and is (also known as "full coöperation").
Metadata was provided in 77% of requests (Score:5, Insightful)
Even Slashdot's editors don't know the value of metadata, calling it "non-content data", at least on the front page post? Click through the link and read the sub-headline: "Microsoft provided metadata in 77 percent of more than 37,000 law-enforcement requests for information".
Your metadata is as valuable as the content [wired.com]. Otherwise, why would the NSA and Facebook invest so much in it?
Re:And the remaining 8%? (Score:4, Insightful)
Which part of "from law enforcement agencies around the world" did you fail to notice? American, are you?
Re:Stop this artificial distinction of 'metadata' (Score:5, Insightful)
what it _actually_ means is that 77% of the time law enforcement has bothered to go through the legal track and 23% of the time it's just some duud agent/officer calling MS up "hey givez data!".
and in 2% of cases they requested content data.
however - this is just the LEGALLY requested data - relating to just normal legal police work, like for finding address of some blackmailer and what have you. there can be no mention of the intercepts they're not allowed to talk that even happened... so that data is NOT in these stats so these stats are just smokescreen. the metadata dumps are an entirely different animal!
Re:Should be 0% or 100% (Score:4, Insightful)
And if you had broken the law by giving them the data, would you subsequently have been under investigation?
Are your choices basically,