Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Supercomputing Government Technology

US Intel Agencies To Build Superconducting Computer 73

dcblogs writes "The Director of National Intelligence is soliciting help to develop a superconducting computer. The goal of the government's solicitation is 'to demonstrate a small-scale computer based on superconducting logic and cryogenic memory that is energy efficient, scalable, and able to solve interesting problems.' The NSA, in particular, has had a long interest in superconducting technology, but 'significant technical obstacles prevented exploration of superconducting computing,' the government said in its solicitation. Those innovations include cryogenic memory designs that allow operation of memory and logic in close proximity within the cold environment, as well as much faster switching speeds. U.S. intelligence agencies don't disclose the size of their systems, but the NSA is building a data center in Utah with a 65 MW power supply."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Intel Agencies To Build Superconducting Computer

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 06, 2013 @01:13PM (#44488059)

    "Why Big Brother, what big eyes you have!"

    "All the better to see you with, my dear."

  • by MindStalker ( 22827 ) <mindstalker@nosPam.gmail.com> on Tuesday August 06, 2013 @01:50PM (#44488629) Journal

    http://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/design/superconductor-logic-goes-lowpower [ieee.org]

    It appears that "logic" is done through wave form cancellation.

    You have a waveform, if you pass through the same point an inverse waveform you cancel out the waveforms and end up with a 0, or a matches wave form will amplify the signal giving you a 1. Though, no, I don't fully understand how this is used for computation, it doesn't appear that they know either.

  • by icebike ( 68054 ) on Tuesday August 06, 2013 @02:58PM (#44489627)

    The founding fathers never intended the bill of rights to apply to the internet.

    Actually, the founding fathers never intended the bill of rights PERIOD.

    So many ordinary citizens saw the dangers of authoritarian government that some colonies refused to ratify the Constitution until the Bill of Rights was added.

    The first Bill of Rights was proposed during the convention but was defeated by a unanimous vote of the state delegations after only a brief discussion. Madison, then an opponent of a Bill of Rights, later explained the vote by calling the state bills of rights "parchment barriers" that offered only an illusion of protection against tyranny. (More prophetic words were seldom spoken.) Madison only later became in favor of the BOR.

    It wasn't till 11 states had ratified the Constitution and the first congress met that the Bill of Rights was actually added, after a bitter and protracted debate. The first 12 amendments were submitted to the states for ratification in 1789 (only 10 passed). Only after this did the holdout colonies decide to become part of the United States.

One possible reason that things aren't going according to plan is that there never was a plan in the first place.

Working...