Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Cellphones Privacy

Motorola Is Listening 287

New submitter pbritt writes "Ben Lincoln was hooking up to Microsoft ActiveSync at work when he 'made an interesting discovery about the Android phone (a Motorola Droid X2) which [he] was using at the time: it was silently sending a considerable amount of sensitive information to Motorola, and to compound the problem, a great deal of it was over an unencrypted HTTP channel.' He found that photos, passwords, and even data about his home screen config were being sent regularly to Motorola's servers. He has screenshots showing much of the data transmission."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Motorola Is Listening

Comments Filter:
  • by msauve ( 701917 ) on Tuesday July 02, 2013 @01:36PM (#44167959)
    The NSA would like to thank Motorola for their cooperation.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 02, 2013 @01:39PM (#44167993)

    "A company that listens to its users"

  • by evil_aaronm ( 671521 ) on Tuesday July 02, 2013 @01:39PM (#44167999)
    It's all for "improved customer experience." If they know to whom you're talking, or what pictures you're taking, or what documents you're reading or writing, or where you are at any given moment, they can better tailor their services to fit your needs. I'm surprised this isn't patently obvious. /snark
  • by NEDHead ( 1651195 ) on Tuesday July 02, 2013 @01:56PM (#44168247)

    Patent? Did someone say Patent? What a great idea!

  • by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday July 02, 2013 @02:41PM (#44168853)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 02, 2013 @02:55PM (#44169019)

    5 of your friends read this post. Blink some time within the next 30 seconds to read what they think!

  • by Thud457 ( 234763 ) on Tuesday July 02, 2013 @02:57PM (#44169047) Homepage Journal
    so I need a FOIA to restore my backup now?
  • by epine ( 68316 ) on Tuesday July 02, 2013 @03:55PM (#44169727)

    I watched a Bill Maher video yesterday in which a conservative politician who clearly believed that cleanliness (and short hair) is next to godliness claimed to believe in "adaptation" but not a certain fish story when confronted by a historically unelectable Canadian politician about whether he believed in antibiotic resistance (in which the evolution of the resistance trait was greatly accelerated by careless overuse).

    I actually cut the guy some slack. There's no reason why he can't logically believe in the special theory of evolution (local adaptation) without necessarily believing in the general theory of evolution (the ascent of complexity from primordial origins). To believe in one without the other requires a larger than average mental judgement in between. Unfortunately, he lamely fell back on invoking the missing link. Bzzzzt. Thanks for playing.

    Clearly he hasn't checked in with the Out of Africa theory lately, which was speculative until we began to read DNA in the early 1980s with all the proficiency of a clever three year old. Right now we're at about year two of a ten year post-graduate program in speed reading for lifeforms with facet eyes. Things have changed. If there were any region of the globe over the past 10,000 years (or 100,000 years) where the genetic lineage of any species of quadruped (Noah being the patron saint of charismatic megafauna) is constricted to a single breeding pair, we'll surely find it soon on the rising flood of sequence data. Dude groomed for rapture should be worrying about the missing crink, not the missing link.

    I can't say I have a higher opinion of "blame the government". It's like blaming calcium for arthritis, on the grounds that sans calcium, arthritis as we know it would no longer exist. The problem here is that calcium is just the implementation. The specification is to have a load bearing structure nimble enough to evade and pursue (aka biosecurity). A large branch of the solution space descends from elbows and kneecaps.

    One of the major functions of a large population is agreeing on the threat enough to achieve cohesion in the threat response. This is mirrored in the organism by how the fight/flight response is balanced on a knife edge, and how the hormones that prime this metabolic state also tamps down immune response. Guess what, libertarians, that's a centralized response.

    You can discard the implementation (government as we know it), but you can't discard the specification. Unfortunately, contrary to the most vociferous howls, the problems are actually rooted in the specification, not the implementation.

    Just like replacing an aging software system, while it's absolutely certain that the worst points of friction in the existing system will go away, new points of friction are extremely likely to take their place, unless you stumble upon the "silver bullet" solution paradigm (social media won't let you down). I tend to be fairly reluctant to stick up my hand when a surgeon promises to cure my arthritic knee by lopping off my leg and grafting on a tentacle to replace it. I worry that might bring with it new problems every bit as annoying as the previous problem.

    The present state of the NSA and the legislation around it is pretty much an unbroken story since the end of the first world war. (The Germans did not invent Enigma on a fall afternoon in 1939.) I vaguely recall reading in the The Puzzle Palace (or something similar from the same era) that before the U.S. government passes a law preventing secret agencies from spying on American citizens there was already a secret law on the books exempted a certain no such agency from being beholden to any such future law.

    Democracy it turns out is a lot like the human immune system. It shuts down on a dime in the presence of an acute threat, as defined by the pulsed secretion of some small gland. Once you get to the place where the small gland sees a lion in every box of Cracker Jack, democracy is reduced to vestigial status, until

  • Re:RTFA. (Score:5, Funny)

    by SiChemist ( 575005 ) on Tuesday July 02, 2013 @04:05PM (#44169833) Homepage

    There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors.

  • Re:RTFA. (Score:5, Funny)

    by icebike ( 68054 ) on Tuesday July 02, 2013 @04:46PM (#44170195)

    Of these three multibillion-dollar corporations, which one has a private jumbo jet for its executives:

    1. ExxonMobil
    2. Verizon
    3. Oracle
    4. Google

    "Don't be evil"? My ass.

    Probably the one that only hires people who know how to count.

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...