Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Piracy The Courts

New Prenda Law Shell Corp Threatening to Tell Your Neighbors You Pirated Porn 258

It appears that Prenda Law, freshly defeated, has formed a new shell company named the "Anti-Piracy Law Group," and has resumed sending threatening letters to supposed porn pirates. But this time, they've expanded their threats (from a letter (PDF) sent to Fight Copyright Trolls): "The list of possible suspects includes you, members of your household, your neighbors (if you maintain an open wi-fi connection) and anyone who might have visited your house. In the coming days we will contact these individuals to investigate whether they have any knowledge of the acts described in my client’s prior letter" Naturally, the letter also notes that the recipient can avoid having the list of videos they supposedly copied sent to their neighbors and family if they settle for a few thousand bucks...
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

New Prenda Law Shell Corp Threatening to Tell Your Neighbors You Pirated Porn

Comments Filter:
  • by Chrisq ( 894406 ) on Tuesday May 14, 2013 @08:15AM (#43718607)

    "The list of possible suspects includes you, members of your household, your neighbors (if you maintain an open wi-fi connection) and anyone who might have visited your house

    So you just say it must have been a neighbour or visitor, ask them to add all the visitors to neighbours' houses, the post man, delivery men, etc. and let them get on with it. If they go to court quote their own words - it could have been any of these!

  • Re:Black mail (Score:5, Interesting)

    It really is blackmail. This is a threat with menances in order to get someone to comply with the sender, and it is not a reasonable way of enforcing the request. If they simply send out the letters, while questionable in other ways it is not blackmail. These threats however are genuine straight up blackmail. I'm not sure whether this is criminal or civil offence in the US, but in the UK you'd be in a lot of trouble for this.

  • Wow ... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by gstoddart ( 321705 ) on Tuesday May 14, 2013 @08:19AM (#43718631) Homepage

    These guys might find themselves getting some pretty major smackdown from a court beyond what has already happened.

    This is straight up extortion, and at this rate, I wouldn't be surprised to see someone slap them with RICO charges or something.

    They don't have any evidence which can stand up in court, so they're resorting to smearing you in front of your family on the assertion that you must have violated a copyright they don't own.

    If ever lawyers needed some sanctions from the court, it's these guys. Epic douchebags.

  • by wvmarle ( 1070040 ) on Tuesday May 14, 2013 @08:26AM (#43718675)

    Just read the letter in the linked article. Reeks of troll. Typical Nigerian-type content: they refer to material stolen from their client, without naming either. Not who that client (presumably copyright holder) might be; nor what content was allegedly stolen. I'm seeing similar vaguely worded e-mails time and again - and most of them are Nigerian scams. They are also intentionally vague, trying to have the reader fill in the gaps (which people automatically do), and make the reader feel as if it's targeting them while it's really a standard letter sent to hundreds if not thousands of people.

    If I'd receive such a letter, I'd probably just toss it in the trash, like I do with similar e-mails. They'd at least have to identify the alleged stolen content, and with that, who their client would be.

    Or would it be possible to file a complaint with police, and have them initiate a criminal investigation? May be hard in practice for a single letter but if more people are targeted they may act on it.

  • Re:Skyclad? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by allaunjsilverfox2 ( 882195 ) on Tuesday May 14, 2013 @09:10AM (#43718945) Homepage Journal
    I watch porn. I enjoy adults performing a natural function. And I have no reason to pirate porn. LITERALLY a search engine away and you have streaming porn. I mean, You have to really enjoy a certain actor to go as far as pirating a video. And then, why not show that you enjoy their work by paying for it? And to those that don't think performing on screen while performing sex acts is work, I would disagree. While I personally have never done so, I can imagine it is quite uncomfortable at times. "Hey earl, Stop, stop, stop! You are doing it wrong, You see her face? She should be begging and you aren't performing like you should. Get out of the way, john, take earls place, he is terrible today." I know that would hurt on a professional and emotional level. >.>
  • Re:Skyclad? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by asylumx ( 881307 ) on Tuesday May 14, 2013 @09:18AM (#43719011)
    No kidding! Why pirate what you can already get for free?
  • Re:Haha, let them. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 14, 2013 @12:27PM (#43721273)

    So porn is fake, but you practice witchcraft. Okay.

  • Re:Black mail (Score:4, Interesting)

    by stanlyb ( 1839382 ) on Tuesday May 14, 2013 @01:42PM (#43722213)
    I have to correct you: NEVER ever make written statements like this, confessing your guilt or innocence. It may sound strange, but after this letter you could go in jail for false claims (and no, there is no need to prove that you actually pirated the "movie").
    In other words, i would rewrite the letter to something like this:
    "Dear Sir, Feel free to investigate my neighbors. Be careful how you word your accusations when making your investigation as we will sue for libel if, as a result of your investigation, any of our neighbors are under the impression we were responsible for the download."

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...