Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts Crime

Judge Refers Prenda Copyright Trolls To Criminal Investigators 134

A reader tipped us to news that the infamous copyright trolls Prenda Law are in a bit of trouble with the law. Today, U.S. District Court judge Otis Wright issued sanctions against Prenda. He recommends that the lawyers involved be disbarred and fined, granted court and lawyer fees to the defendants (doubled for punishment), and has referred them for criminal prosecution. Among the findings of fact are that they set up dozens of shell companies to disguise the true owners, actually committed identity theft, dodged taxes on settlement money, lied to the court, and abused the court by setting settlements on flimsy charges just below the cost of a defense.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Judge Refers Prenda Copyright Trolls To Criminal Investigators

Comments Filter:
  • Re:The fact that.. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Stolpskott ( 2422670 ) on Tuesday May 07, 2013 @07:14AM (#43651683)

    It took this ONE judge basically collecting 5-10 other Fedral cases after putting out an order to consolidate Prenda's cases to fewer jurisdictions. It was only after getting a half dozen other circuit courts to agree, he could even read that they had been using different names and such in different courts. He broke down a lot of the corporate veil judges normally don't get to do.

    It took special permissions from other courts and over a year of sorting paperwork to get ONE SET of troll lawyers. Effectively all this does its chase the trolls out of HIS court, and into courts where the judges won't catch them.

    Actually, the Judge has gone a bit further than that - he has referred all of the individuals identified as actively culpable to the Bar Associations for the districts where they are legally allowed to practice due to their lack of "moral turpitude". Given that judges have no direct control (albeit with considerable influence, but no official ability to directly rule on such matters), he is effectively telling the American Bar association to strike these guys off, take them to a quiet spot, order them to dig a ditch and climb in, ready for the ditch to be filled in.

  • Re: Good (Score:2, Interesting)

    by bill_mcgonigle ( 4333 ) * on Tuesday May 07, 2013 @08:29AM (#43652061) Homepage Journal

    Rather, it was intended to eliminate those who might stand in the way of a contemplated revolution -- thus underscoring the important role that lawyers can play in society.

    Yes, lawyers play an important part in perpetuating the State mechanism.

    lawyers maintain order in society and in order to throw it into chaos they need to get rid of the lawyers.

    Only if you accept that the State represents order rather than being the primary source of chaos [hawaii.edu], preventing just regulatory mechanisms from replacing its role. Indeed, peaceful regulation of society would be revolutionary.

  • Re:Good (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Ollabelle ( 980205 ) on Tuesday May 07, 2013 @11:59AM (#43654831)
    And that in turn might happen if the Senate would stop stonewalling every freakin' judicial appointment offered up http://atyourlibrary.org/culture/even-shortages-federal-bench-cant-get-judicial-appointments-through-congress/ [atyourlibrary.org], and I'm not talking about up or down votes - I'm talking about a refusal to vote.

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...