Florida Supreme Court Rules Police Need Warrant To Search Cell Phones 107
An anonymous reader writes "In a case stemming from a Jacksonville burglary, the Florida Supreme Court ruled 5-2 Thursday that police must get a search warrant before searching someone's cell phone. 'At this time, we cannot ignore that a significant portion of our population relies upon cell phones for email communications, text message information, scheduling, and banking,' read the majority opinion (PDF), authored by Justice Fred Lewis. 'The position of the dissent, which would permit the search here even though no issue existed with regard to officer safety or evidence preservation, is both contrary to, and the antithesis of, the fundamental protections against government intrusion guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.'"
Re:Why the difference? (Score:5, Insightful)
What exactly makes a cellphone (or any digital device) different than any other personal posession? Why did it take a special court ruling (and probably millions of dollars) to "clarify" this "issue"? Does the law (and the constitution) not already state that a person cannot be searched without due process?
Where in the world did this confusion come from?
Cell phones are carried about on your person. Historically, when you are arrested, the police review and inventory items on your possession. They are able to do so because they are arresting you. Any evidence found on your person is admissible in court. However, the modern day cell phone often extends above and beyond the things that a normal person might carry on their person. You might have thousands of messages, emails, your bank statements, and other personal and confidential information you do not make a habit of carrying with you. If the police need access to that information, and have probable cause, then they should have to get a warrant to do so. Just as they would need a warrant to review my call logs, my bank statement, or to search through my house.
Re:Why the difference? (Score:5, Insightful)
To elaborate, the search incident to arrest is justified for the officer's safety. If you had a sealed letter on you, they could open it because there might be a shiv in the letter. In opening that letter, the contents enter plain view which makes them known to the police.
A cell phone is rightly exempt from this, because you can eliminate any possibility that the cell phone is a weapon without examining the data.
Re: Good (Score:2, Insightful)
Could you please cite where marriage is mentioned in the US Constitution?
You know, since the Federal Marriage Amendment hasn't passed yet.
Re: Good (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: Good (Score:2, Insightful)
Also, marriage != religion.
Ahh, yes. Sanctity of marriage when you need it, marriage != religion when you don't. It must be nice to be able to flip flop to whatever position is suitable for you in any situation.
--Jeremy
Re: Good (Score:2, Insightful)
"No federal law has been made to impede the free exercise of religion on marriage."
Married people and single people are treated differently under numerous federal laws. That's a form of discrimination one way or the other. All such laws should be repealed.
"marriage != religion."
Marriage was a religious thing long before it became a government thing.
Re: Good (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:A win for me! (Score:4, Insightful)
But it's Florida. Don't you have to take a sanity test and fail it before you're allowed to move there?
Re: Good (Score:5, Insightful)
Slavery was legal because some states said so; we had to fight a bloody war to make the point that it was not. States are not independent. Get over it. The state's rights thing has been invoked in slavery/gay-sex-crime/keep-the-former-slaves-out-of-our-schools/miscegenation/jesus-is-king/we-can-marry-kids case for over a hundred fifty years. No matter how many times the Confederacy trots this out, we will slap it down.
Marriage was, is, and will be a government-controlled institution. You aren't married by the power of Jesus, but by the power vested by the State in the justice of the peace, or minister, or druid. And there was marriage long before we invented gods.