Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy Advertising

Millennials Willing To Share Personal Data — For a Price 88

jfruh writes "The rap on the under-30 crowd is that they don't care anywhere near as much about online privacy as their elders — but that's not quite true. According to a recent study by USC's Annenberg Center for the Digital Future, millennials are just as concerned about the use of their personal data online as their elders. The difference arises when it comes to why they share that data: older users share with someone they trust, while millennials share when they perceive that there's something in it for them."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Millennials Willing To Share Personal Data — For a Price

Comments Filter:
  • Under 25 (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Zaelath ( 2588189 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2013 @08:06PM (#43531439)

    I'd say you need them under 25, since science keeps proving my theory that they're still children until 25+

    http://www.hhs.gov/opa/familylife/tech_assistance/etraining/adolescent_brain/Development/prefrontal_cortex/index.html [hhs.gov]

    This brain region gives an individual the capacity to exercise “good judgment” when presented with difficult life situations. Brain research indicating that brain development is not complete until near the age of 25, refers specifically to the development of the prefrontal cortex.

    Seems though that once they're used to being Facebook's bitch, they can age to any level and post justify their adolescent actions. As many on this thread will no doubt show.

  • Semantics! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by girlintraining ( 1395911 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2013 @08:10PM (#43531489)

    The older crowd will share info with people they trust, and the millenials when they can turn a buck. I don't see the difference, really -- the only variable is the currency. Trust relationships are also based on a give-take, but it's implicit. In the latter case, the relationship is an explicit give-take. So what this comes down to is exaggerating the differences between two groups -- and gee, go figure... news agencies thrive on creating differences where none exist in order to generate a story.

One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...