New Revenue Model For Low Budget Films: Lawsuits 162
conspirator23 writes "A 64-year-old retired English teacher is being sued by a copyright troll for illegal BitTorrent downloading of a motion picture. Perhaps it's not all that shocking in the current era. That is, until we learn that rather than protecting something like Game of Thrones, the plaintiff is accusing Emily Orlando of Estacada, Oregon of downloading Maximum Conviction, a direct-to-video action flick released earlier this year starring Steven Segal and ex-WWE wrestler Steve Austin. Voltage Pictures is demanding $7500 from Emily and 370 other defendants. If all the defendants were to pay the demands, Voltage would gross over $2.75 million, minus legal fees. Who needs Kickstarter?"
As you might expect, Mrs. Orlando had never heard of BitTorrent before receiving the legal threat, and she lives in an area with dynamic IP assignments. This is the same company who has been going after file-sharers by the thousands since 2010.
Hurt Locker? (Score:5, Insightful)
So Simple... (Score:5, Insightful)
Convince a good lawyer to take this as a class action. Sue for court costs, his own legal fees and emotional damages. I can't imagine jury anywhere on the planet that wouldn't give the win to the little old lady. Use this as a model for said trolls and when it becomes clear that we are hoisting these parasites on their own petards, perhaps they'll go away!
Re:Can't wait for there to be case law (Score:1, Insightful)
Yeah and you call the NRA "nuts". I have yet to hear any of my friends and coworkers that are the less gun control side of the debate talk about shooting the opposition but I hear it frequently from the anti-gun crowd. Of course you think nobody should have access to guns. you think everyone is a screwed up and irresponsible as yourselves.
I will agree that anyone who thinks guns should be more limited in the USA should not be allowed to have them because they generally have proven themselves unable to handle that level of responsibility.