Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Patents Your Rights Online

You Don't 'Own' Your Own Genes 293

olePigeon (Wik) writes "Cornell University's New York based Weill Cornell Medical College issued a press release today regarding an unsettling trend in the U.S. patent system: Humans don't "own" their own genes, the cellular chemicals that define who they are and what diseases for which they might be at risk. Through more than 40,000 patents on DNA molecules, companies have essentially claimed the entire human genome for profit, report Dr. Christopher E. Mason of Weill Cornell Medical College, and the study's co-author, Dr. Jeffrey Rosenfeld, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey and a member of the High Performance and Research Computing Group, who analyzed the patents on human DNA. Their study, published March 25 in the journal Genome Medicine, raises an alarm about the loss of individual 'genomic liberty.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

You Don't 'Own' Your Own Genes

Comments Filter:
  • by schneidafunk ( 795759 ) on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @03:39PM (#43284281)
    "The U.S. Supreme Court will review genomic patent rights in an upcoming hearing on April 15. At issue is the right of a molecular diagnostic company to claim patents not only on two key breast and ovarian cancer genes — BRCA1 and BRCA2 — but also on any small sequence of code within BRCA1, including a striking patent for only 15 nucleotides. " ...

    "This means if the Supreme Court upholds the current scope of the patents, no physician or researcher can study the DNA of these genes from their patients, and no diagnostic test or drug can be developed based on any of these genes without infringing a patent," says Dr. Mason.

    * Personally I believe the supreme court will throw out these patents.
  • sue (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @03:56PM (#43284513)

    So if you get sick with cancer, just sue the company that is the owner of the gene. Tell the courts they own the patent and you never asked for there products to be put into you. Make clear you only want those mutated cancer cells removed that they own.. Free cancer treatment.

  • Re:Derivative Works (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @05:15PM (#43285499)

    Monsanto claims to have patents on genes in seed. If you happen to come up with some seed by any means with those genes in them, it's consideed infringing. So, I think your comment here is likely wrong.

  • Re:Derivative Works (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Entropius ( 188861 ) on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @05:18PM (#43285525)

    If you believe in software patents, then aren't Monsanto's patents just an extension of that? They're just sequences of code that, when compiled and run, does a particular thing...

  • Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @07:23PM (#43286695)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion

"Engineering without management is art." -- Jeff Johnson

Working...