Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Censorship Security Spam The Internet Your Rights Online

The Internet's Bad Neighborhoods 77

Posted by timothy
from the wrong-crowd dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Of the 42,000 Internet Service Providers (ISPs) surveyed, just 20 were found to be responsible for nearly half of all the spamming IP addresses — and some ISPs have more than 60% of compromised hosts, mostly in Asia. Phishing Bad Neighborhoods, on the other hand, are mostly in the U.S. Also, there is a silent ticking 'spam' bomb in BRIC countries: if India would have the same Internet penetration rate as the United States while keeping its current ratio of malicious IP addresses, we would observe 200% more spamming IP addresses worldwide. These are just few of the striking results of an extensive study from the University of Twente, in The Netherlands, which scrutinizes the Internet Bad Neighborhoods to develop next-generation algorithms and solutions to better secure networks."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Internet's Bad Neighborhoods

Comments Filter:
  • by roman_mir (125474) on Thursday March 14, 2013 @05:36PM (#43176437) Homepage Journal

    Brazil: 196,655,014 people (World Bank)
    Russia: 141,930,000 people
    India: 1,241,491,960 people
    China: 1,344,130,000 people

    that's 2,924,206,974 people total.
    world population: 6,973,738,433 people, so BRIC countries are 41% of the total in population.

    FTFA:

    Of the 42,000 Internet Service Providers (ISPs) surveyed, just 20 were found to be responsible for nearly half of all the internet addresses that send spam.

    so I take it "nearly half" is between 40% and 50%, but less than 50%. If it's over 41%, then what we are looking here is some form of distribution of 'nuisance' that is related to the actual population and it probably shows normal distribution.

    Is this really a surprise?

  • Final solution (Score:4, Interesting)

    by PopeRatzo (965947) on Thursday March 14, 2013 @06:57PM (#43177171) Homepage Journal

    Clearly the only solution is to only let the world's biggest telecoms provide Internet to people.

    I would gladly take an Internet with some "bad neighborhoods" over a completely safe Internet provided by entirely by AT&T/Comcast and a handful of megacorps who are also involved in creating content.

    The Internet/Media/Industrial Complex loves to tell us scary stories about how dangerous an "open" Internet can be. Apparently, the Internet, like the "free market" is only good if they can control it.

    Just sell us some bandwidth and I'll look out for my own safety, thanks very much.

"If you are afraid of loneliness, don't marry." -- Chekhov

Working...