Cablevision Suing Viacom Over Cable Bundling 138
aws910 points to an L.A. Times article which explains that "Cablevision (a huge cable network) is suing Viacom (owner of MTV, Nickelodeon, etc), alleging that Viacom is violating U.S. federal anti-trust laws by requiring programming packages to be bundled. If they are victorious, it would be a tiny step closer to 'a la carte cable,' but not much — Cablevision just wants to make their own bundles, and not give the customer the freedom to choose which channels they get. Where can I get my "Kill your TV" bumper sticker?" The thing I care more about buying separately is no-TV internet service, which the major cable companies seem reluctant to admit is even possible.
Re:reluctant? (Score:3, Informative)
They offer it, but it's more expensive than if you accept at least basic cable service as well.
Suggesting that they offer cable only is a bit disingenuous as you have to know about it and pay more for less.
From a Legal Standpoint (Score:4, Informative)