Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
China Government Security IT Your Rights Online

Bit9 Says 32 Malicious Programs Whitelisted In Recent Hack 18

Posted by timothy
from the nice-binary-number dept.
chicksdaddy writes "The security firm Bit9 released a more detailed analysis of the hack of its corporate network was part of a larger operation that was aimed a firms in a 'very narrow market space' and intended to gather information from the firms. The analysis, posted on Monday on Bit9's blog is the most detailed to date of a hack that was first reported on February 8 by the blog Krebsonsecurity.com, but that began in July, 2012. In the analysis, by Bit9 Chief Technology Officer Harry Sverdlove said 32 separate malware files and malicious scripts were whitelisted in the hack. Bit9 declined to name the three customers affected by the breach, or the industry segment that was targeted, but denied that it was a government agency or a provider of critical infrastructure such as energy, utilities or banking. The small list of targets — just three — and the fact that one malware program was communicating with a system involved in a recent 'sinkholing operation' raises the specter that the hack of Bit9 may have played a part in the recent attacks on Facebook, Twitter and Apple, though Bit9 declined to name the firms or the market they serve."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Bit9 Says 32 Malicious Programs Whitelisted In Recent Hack

Comments Filter:
  • Re:"Whitelisted" (Score:5, Informative)

    by whyloginwhysubscribe (993688) on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @09:26AM (#43013737)
    I understood this as the hack whitelisting malware which should have been blacklisted... So it was used correctly.
  • Re:"Whitelisted" (Score:4, Informative)

    by hAckz0r (989977) on Tuesday February 26, 2013 @11:14AM (#43014987)
    Yes, Bit9 software is a default deny paradigm, and so anything that is allowed to run on your system needs to be explicitly allowed, so malware can't get onto your system so easily (buffer overflows are still possible). That being said, Bit9 did not protect one of their all important signing keys, so the hacker used it and signed a whole lot of bad stuff they had in their tool bag. The hacker thereby added all his malware to the permitted white-list because they were signed by an authority that is trusted by the software protecting the systems. Who could be more trusted than the software company who protects your computer?

The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny ..." -- Isaac Asimov

Working...