Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Piracy United Kingdom Your Rights Online

UK ISPs Asked To Block More File-sharing Websites 89

another random user writes with this news from the BBC: "The UK's major internet service providers have been asked to block three more file-sharing websites. The BPI (British Phonographic Industry), which acts on behalf of rights holders, wants ISPs to prevent access to Fenopy, H33t and Kickass Torrents. The BPI alleges that the sites are illegally distributing music. The ISPs told the BBC they would comply with the new demand, but only if a court order is put in place. It follows a separate court order in April which saw popular file-sharing site The Pirate Bay blocked in the UK. ... The letter, which was not intended to go public, was sent to six ISPs last week, namely BT, Sky, Virgin Media, O2, EE and TalkTalk. It is understood that the BPI is hoping all three sites will be blocked before Christmas — far more quickly than the process has taken previously."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

UK ISPs Asked To Block More File-sharing Websites

Comments Filter:
  • by JosKarith ( 757063 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2012 @04:16AM (#41749513)
    So TPB's ban was the thin end of the wedge? What a surprise.
    And I absolutely love "The letter, which was not intended to go public" - so they want ISP's to filter traffic for them without all the hassle of legal process or negative public opinion.
  • by fph il quozientatore ( 971015 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2012 @04:32AM (#41749577)
    Incidentally, I found out that in Germany they *do* have an industry association for that... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%9CFA [wikipedia.org]
  • by FBeans ( 2201802 ) on Wednesday October 24, 2012 @05:32AM (#41749865)

    Remember that time where the internet was freedom? Where one could create a website, it was subject to law, like any other act. Remember when the providers of the internet buckled under the pressure from "the powers that be". Sites could be blocked, freedom quashed, because somebody didn't like the content of a site, because somebody thought it aided in crime and law breaking, despite not breaking any laws itself.

    When we start forcing ISPs to block sites, based on anything other than law, we open gates that will never be closed. One leads to more, more to many and eventually freedom on the internet will be dead.

    This is the key issue we are dealing with. It is getting overlooked because "piracy is bad". We have many other questions to ask: does blocking these sites even /help/ the problem of piracy? this [bbc.co.uk] suggests not! Is piracy really the problem, perhaps the intermediate companies between consumer and author's of content are to blame somewhat?

    Why do we have to constantly start making much larger problems while trying to fix smaller ones. Fix the music industry, the film industry, the E-book-monolopy that Amazon is building, fix the problem at the root. Provide consumers with a modern, suitable market in which they pay the author's of content for their products, for a price that represents the true worth of that product. Allow the consumer to have freedom with that product to use it in any device, in any form. Provide a good service, that is value-for-money, and people /will/ use it. We've seen it work before [torrentfreak.com]

    Leave the internet alone, once the gates are open the wars begin....

    (This is one army, preparing arms... [internetde...league.org]

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...