Post-ACTA Agreement CETA Moving Forward With Similar Provisions 136
rrohbeck writes "From eff.org: 'The shadow of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) is back in Europe. It is disguised as CETA, the Canada-European Union and Trade Agreement. A comparison of the leaked draft Canada-EU agreement shows the treaty includes a number of the same controversial provisions, specifically concerning criminal enforcement, private enforcement by Internet Service Providers (ISPs), and harsh damages.'"
Blame Canada! Blame Canada! (Score:4, Funny)
Before somebody thinks of blaming us.
Re:You can't win... (Score:4, Funny)
I really like this idea... I suppose that makes me a peto-phyle.
Re:War on FARTS (Score:0, Funny)
Fucking Arsole Retarded Twit Shitheads
like you whom bend over and are part of the problem in fact YOU are the enemy and in fact most of the people like you if we really traced you back work for what you say you cannot fight....
freedom is not free we must always know when to self sacrifice for it for the betterment of all. THIS CRAP DOES NOT HELP MANKIND and ONLY HELPS A FEW GREEDY IDIOTS.....
Re:War on drugs (Score:4, Funny)
The GP didn't imply that there is a relation between lawfulness and wrongness. Actually he not so subtly implied the exact opposite, that the two things are different concepts and should not be confused with each other, idea that I completely agree with, by the way.
Why the hell do I attract rational and well-reasoned posters like you from time to time, despite my best efforts? I don't want you to see the logic here! I want you to fly into a frothing rage, saying how I'm oppressing some off-beat political view of yours, making giant leaps to conclusions, twisting my words, and typing in all caps with at least three exclamation points in your 15 paragraph masterpiece. Yeesh, this is slashdot... we have standards here.
I appreciate your support, but if you really want to help me out, go throw out some catch phrase in an argument... like "correlation is not causation", or imply some esoteric logical fallacy like I'm making a "straw man" or an "ad hominim" attack. If you're feeling particularly supportive, I haven't seen anything digging into my gender or sexuality in awhile and I'm really growing concerned about the overall quality of posts from my detractors! :) But above all else, you have to display a vague sense of intellectualism, implying that you're smarter than me, and making thinly veiled personal attacks. That's really what I'm looking for in a detractor.
Thanks again! Look forward to the hate mail. :D