Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Advertising Privacy Your Rights Online

An Overview of the Do Not Track Debate 108

Posted by Soulskill
from the no-means-no dept.
jonathanmayer writes "The Verge is carrying an accurate and accessible overview of the Do Not Track debate. Quoting: 'With the fate of our beloved internet economy allegedly at stake, perhaps it's a good time to examine what Do Not Track is. How did the standard come to be, what does it do, and how does it stand to change online advertising? Is it as innocuous as privacy advocates make it sound, or does it stand to jeopardize the free, ad-supported internet we've all come to rely on?' The issues surrounding Do Not Track can be difficult to understand, owing to rampant rhetoric and spin. This article unpacks the tracking technology, privacy concerns, economic questions, and political outlook. Full disclosure: I'm quoted."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

An Overview of the Do Not Track Debate

Comments Filter:
  • NoScript (Score:5, Interesting)

    by digitalaudiorock (1130835) on Friday October 12, 2012 @04:22PM (#41636101)

    The thing that pisses me off the most about most (even supposedly reputable) web sites these days, is the eye opener you get if you run NoScript. The fact that the home pages of supposedly reputable sites are trying to pull in javascript from like a dozen or more unrelated sites is just fucking inexcusable, and it seems to get worse every day.

    Worse yet is that some of those simply don't work at all unless you resort to "Temporarily allow all from this page", in which case I tend to just bail and never go back. I mean seriously...WTF??? I can't tell you how that burns my ass.

10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.

Working...