Appeals Court: You Can Infringe a Patent Even If You Didn't Do All the Steps 126
reebmmm writes "In a much anticipated patent law case, an en banc panel of the Federal Circuit overturned existing law and came out in favor a new rule for indirect infringement: you can still be liable for infringing even if no single person does all the infringement. This case consolidated two different cases involving internet patents. In McKesson v. Epic, a lower court found that Epic did not infringe a patent about a patient portal because one of the steps was performed by the patient accessing the portal. In Akamai v. Limelight, the lower court found that Limelight did not infringe because its customers, not the company itself, tagged content. This is likely headed for the Supreme Court."
Infringe all the patents! (Score:5, Funny)
Doesn't this mean that any software system with an API could be potentially infringing on every software patent ever filed?
Re:Cory Doctorow FTW! (Score:2, Funny)
Word UP! Done. See Revelations... Stand in line... Take a number... Once everyone gets a number a name will be revealed and He will demonstrate "Prior Art!"
Watch out for 7 lawyers on horseback,,,
OMG, I'm gong to patent jail (Score:2, Funny)
I accidentally saw a Samsung phone when I went to buy my iPhone. I'm in violation!