Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Your Rights Online

Craigslist Drops Exclusive License To Your Posts 63

First time accepted submitter Penurious Penguin writes "Last week Craigslist demanded exclusive license to the content you post there, an odd demand which would have prevented ad-content on Craigslist from being advertised anywhere else but Craigslist. Thankfully, today we read from the EFF, the Good News: Craigslist drops exclusive license to your posts. From the article: 'For many years, craigslist has been a good digital citizen. Its opposition to SOPA/PIPA was critically important, and it has been at the forefront of challenges to Section 230 and freedom of expression online. We understand that craigslist faces real challenges in trying to preserve its character and does not want third parties to simply reuse its content in ways that are out of line with its user community’s expectations and could be harmful to its users. Nevertheless, it was important for craigslist to remove the provision because claiming an exclusive license to the user’s posts--to the exclusion of everyone, including the original poster--would have harmed both innovation and users’ rights, and would have set a terrible precedent. We met with craigslist to discuss this recently and are pleased about their prompt action.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Craigslist Drops Exclusive License To Your Posts

Comments Filter:
  • Liability issue (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Billly Gates ( 198444 ) on Thursday August 09, 2012 @08:32PM (#40940271) Journal

    I am no lawyer (would appreciate it a lawyer to comment on this) but it seems obvious that CraigsList would be liable for user content if they claimed they owned it. People have been raped, murdered, robbed, and had identity stolen, from that website. I cringe when I apply for jobs using it as I know bad guys use it as well but I have to work right?

    If I were a lawyer for these victims I would be drooling at the fact that CL claims they own that post and all its content in that scam!

  • by WillAffleckUW ( 858324 ) on Thursday August 09, 2012 @08:45PM (#40940411) Homepage Journal

    No matter how much you pay lawyers to pretend it's true, boilerplate legalese can't remove your implicit copyright to your own works.

    But the copyright and patent systems in the US are so messed up that most people think it's ok.

Ya'll hear about the geometer who went to the beach to catch some rays and became a tangent ?

Working...