Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy Government The Courts Transportation United States Your Rights Online Politics

EPIC Files Motion About Ignored Body Scanner Ruling 183

OverTheGeicoE writes "The Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a motion in court yesterday regarding the court's ignored year-old ruling on EPIC vs. DHS. EPIC is asking the court to require DHS to start taking public comment within 60 days or, as an alternative, forbid DHS from using body scanners in primary airport screening altogether. If the court orders the latter, that would give EPIC what it originally sought in its lawsuit. Meanwhile, for what it's worth, the related petition on whitehouse.gov has a little more than half the signatures it needs to get an official 'response.' The signing period ends on August 9."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

EPIC Files Motion About Ignored Body Scanner Ruling

Comments Filter:
  • by DeTech ( 2589785 ) on Thursday July 19, 2012 @01:06PM (#40700867)

    molested every day for the rest of my life? Yes.

    I know some people who would pay for that.

  • by acidfast7 ( 551610 ) on Thursday July 19, 2012 @01:17PM (#40701043)

    ...the freakin' Italians ... bought them and ditched them, because they were found to be worthless (in terms of security value).

    Cue circus sounds ...

    Show "typical nuclear American" family participating in security theater...

    Exit left with a loud sucking sound ... zoom out slightly to show two chins and a 48oz cola ... and a "man, I feel much better after getting my shoes back on after going through security."

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 19, 2012 @01:47PM (#40701497)

    You know, if one person, just one person does it they may think he's really sick and they won't take him. And if two people, two people do it, in harmony, they may think they're both faggots and they won't take either of them. And three people do it, three, can you imagine, three people walking in singing a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. They may think it's an
    organization. And can you, can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day walking in singing a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. And friends they may thinks it's a movement.

    And that's what it is, the Alice's Restaurant Anti-Massacre Movement, and all you got to do to join is sing it the next time it come's around on the guitar.

    With feeling. [slashdot.org]

  • by element-o.p. ( 939033 ) on Thursday July 19, 2012 @02:47PM (#40702275) Homepage

    ...and the passengers wary (and often pissed off) the only real chance a terrorist has...

    Dang...I never thought of that. TSA *IS* effective counter-terrorism, just not in the way I ever thought. They get the passengers pissed off before boarding the airplane, the more pissed off the better. Then, if someone *does* try to hijack or blow up an airliner in flight, the rest of the passengers, eager to vent their frustration on someone, ANYONE, rip the terrorist to shreds. Voila! Terrorism problem solved!

  • Re:LOL (Score:5, Funny)

    by Brain-Fu ( 1274756 ) on Thursday July 19, 2012 @04:47PM (#40703913) Homepage Journal

    So who voted for them?

    Diebold.

Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.

Working...