Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Australia Government Your Rights Online

Australia To Review Copyright Fair Use 87

New submitter freddienumber13 writes "The Australian Government has announced a review of the copyright act to look at the provisions of fair use and exceptions with a view towards considering whether or not the law has kept pace with technology and thus if further provisions are required to ensure the act remains relevant and effective." Don't hold your breath; the committee has until November 30th, 2013 to create their report. Maybe Australians will see their Fair Use rights expanded in a time when it's in fashion to expand copyright protections.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Australia To Review Copyright Fair Use

Comments Filter:
  • by k(wi)r(kipedia) ( 2648849 ) on Monday July 02, 2012 @08:40PM (#40522917)
    The file-sharing issue aside, I believe copyrights shouldn't be used like patents on ideas, where mere similarity in plot, character or overall design becomes grounds for suing the developer of another work. For instance, fanfiction should be legalised, where there's a clear distinction between the author of the original work and the author of the derivative.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 02, 2012 @09:29PM (#40523173)

    If you want things to improve, help the Pirate Party Australia get a voice into parliament by joining.
    http://pirateparty.org.au/join

    Joining is currently free.
    Help get your voice heard.

  • by Capsaicin ( 412918 ) * on Tuesday July 03, 2012 @01:09AM (#40524257)

    Why even consider harmonizing with US law?

    You're harmonising [sic] with US spelling, why do you expect the law to remain immune?

    Seriously though, the reason is the net. The late C20th and early C21st has seen IP law move into 2 related directions. Firstly attempts to reduce the risk digital communications pose to IP holders and the concomitant internationalisation of the Law. Given the position of the US as the world's major content creator (Silicon valley and Hollywood) and the decline of their "hard" manufacturing sector, it is unsurprising that (after a century of isolating themselves from the international IP scene) they have sought most vigorously to establish a regime which protects the value of their exports.

    The code apocryphally dreamt up in the legal depts. of your Disneys, passed onto US negotiators at the WTO has been incorporated via instruments such as TRIPS, into the municipal law of WTO member countries. Thus similar provisions to those found the in the US DMCA, were incorporated into our copyright law via the Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000 (C'th). Nor were these the last. Such is the price of membership and we are not about to drop out of the WTO any time soon..

    Having imported many of the new restrictions, it is thought we ought also to access a few of the liberties. However, the decision to devise "fair use" exception must also be understood in the context of facilitating international business. Take the concrete example of some US based vendor who incorporates what is there allowable fair use content into a product which could be sold also in Australia. The dangers posed by a non-harmonised legal framework poses for such transactions ought to be obvious.

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...