Photographer Threatened With Legal Action After Asserting His Copyright 667
New submitter JamieKitson writes "Photographer Jay Lee got more than he bargained for after sending some DMCA takedown notifications out to hosts of sites using one of his pictures. One Candice Shwagger accused him of everything from conspiracy over local sheriff elections to child abuse. Since Candice is now threatening legal action, Jay has said he'll take down the post, so here's a snap shot. After reading the story, I checked for use of my own pictures and found one of them being used on a review site without even a credit."
Re:How (Score:4, Funny)
Well, of course... (Score:5, Funny)
Elrond: We cannot use the DCMA. That we now know too well. It belongs to Sauron and was made by him alone, and is altogether evil.
Paranoid Schizophrenia (Score:5, Funny)
Re:How (Score:4, Funny)
Try googling Google Image Search...
Hey dude, I heard you like Google so I.... aaah, screw it. I can't stand that meme anyway.
Re:Very, very interesting - but.... (Score:3, Funny)
Practical advice for the guy in TFA? If you're going to post your photos on-line, put a great big watermark on it that says something to the effect of, "If you want to use this photo, YOU NEED TO PAY ME! Email whatever@ whatever.com for details!"
Here's some additional practical advice:
- Find out the website / phone number / office of the bar agency in your state; such as Wisconsin [wisbar.org]
- Research there to find out attorneys that specialize in intellectual property law, specifically copyright law
- Meet with these attorneys and find out what their rates are
- Pay your preferred attorney a retainer
- Find your copyrighted photographs being used for commercial gain with permission (note: this is potentially *criminal* copyright infringement)
- Have your attorney sue the copyright infringer (up to $150,000 per photograph infringed)
- Win in court; get paid (aka: PROFIT!!)
Your attorney can also give you helpful hints on what to include in the watermark (as suggested by parent).
The right stuff in the watermark can make the difference in court, especially if the infringer tries to remove/obfuscate the watermark instead of paying.
Re:Paranoid Schizophrenia (Score:4, Funny)
Paranoid Schizophrenia
Shouldn't that be Polaroid Schizophrenia?
Re:OMFG - Gorgeous material! (Score:5, Funny)
"... Doesn't look like she's missing too many meals" http://www.examiner.com/slideshow/candice-schwager?slide=37962031 [examiner.com]
She eats the babies she can't save.
Re:How (Score:5, Funny)
That's one crazy lady... (Score:5, Funny)
Reading just bits and pieces of this lady's blog it is quite apparent that she is full-on batshit, tea-party, paranoid-about-liberal-media crazy. Ignoring the fact that most of her wrath should be directed toward the insane policies of GoDaddy who are the ones who decided to shut down ALL her sites over a single photograph, she needs to have someone with backbone sue her dumb ass for slander and defamation so she can see how the law actually works. She needs a massive mental slap upside the head to rattle her brain back into place. She's pulling conspiracies out of thin air left and right, making all kinds of accusations without a shred of evidence. Oh, her evidence is, "I don't believe in coincidences."
I love the cognitive dissonance of these people. She quotes a supposed conservative psychologist expounding on some sort of horribly obvious but also incredibly nebulous psychological "problem" with Obama: "His externalizing all blame to conservatives, George W. Bush, or the “racist” bogeyman hints at persecutory delusions." Funny, I thought that's what conservatives were doing all day long, in the other direction. Externalizing all blame for literally EVERYTHING to liberals and Obama. Pot, kettle, carbon motherfuckin' black.
Wow. Just wow. Reading that blog is scary. She should apply for a job at Fox News. I'm sure she'd fit in perfectly. Now excuse me while I go scrub the crazy out of my brain with some Dragonball.
Re:How (Score:5, Funny)
Muwahahahahaha I can control life with this magical photo of you, and this wedding photo of you kissing your spouse will destroy your life! Careful, I might even say your name three times because we all know there's magic in names!
Dear Rasperin,
You are cordially invited to speak my name thrice any time you wish.
Yours truly,
Hastur.
Re:How (Score:3, Funny)
Spoken like a true genie!
"... For first thousand years I was trapped in this cubicle by the seal of our CEO Suleiman ibn Daud, I thought I'd give my prized red stapler to whoever frees me. For second thousand of years I promised I'll deliver great teamwork skill and ROI to whoever frees me [skipped] And now, after five thousand years, when I'm finally getting promoted to supervisor, I swore by Allah's name I'll sue the accursed soul that frees me and call my 7000 efreet lawyer brothers to torture him till the end of the time"
Re:That's one crazy lady... (Score:4, Funny)
She supports Newt. Clearly not Tea Party. But hey, it's fun to characterize an entire group of people based on the words and actions of a single tangentially related individual, isn't it? Makes you feel real superior. Awesome.
My bad. Allow me to sincerely apologize for mistaking one group of batshit crazy liberal-media-conspiracies-are-destroying-the-universe loons for a completely different batshit crazy liberal-media-conspiracies-are-destroying-the-universe loons. I can't imagine how I got so confused.
By the way, I was using "tea party" as a figure of speech, as in "crazy like the tea party", which is why it's hyphenated and uncapitalized. Not that it particularly matters. Nuts is nuts, no matter what side they're on or what they call themselves.