Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Facebook Privacy The Courts Your Rights Online

Facebook Privacy Suit Seeks $15 Billion 92

An anonymous reader writes "The folks at Facebook may be focusing on their IPO today, but a complaint filed in federal court has given them something else to think about. The filing consolidates 21 separate but similar cases and alleges Facebook invaded users privacy by tracking their browsing behavior even after they had logged out of the site. The claim seeks $15 billion in damages. 'If the claimants are successful in their case against Facebook, they could prevent Menlo Park from collecting the huge amount of data it collects about its users to serve ads back to them. Like the previous lawsuits, Facebook is once again being accused of violating the Federal Wiretap Act, which provides statutory damages per user of $100 per day per violation, up to a maximum per user of $10,000. The complaint also asserts claims under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the Stored Communications Act, various California Statutes and California common law.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Facebook Privacy Suit Seeks $15 Billion

Comments Filter:
  • looks like someone (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, 2012 @06:03PM (#40046697)

    denounced citizenship just in time...

  • by simplexion ( 1142447 ) on Friday May 18, 2012 @06:04PM (#40046709)
    If you want privacy, don't sign up to Facebook.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 18, 2012 @06:26PM (#40046891)

    Well the idea that one should just avoid the service is reasonable. However, the conditions under which people signed up may have shifted AFTER they signed up. The privacy situation at Facebook started shifting a LOT and often a few years back. So under the conditions promised, one might have signed up and then they changed those conditions unbeknownst to you.

    The idea of court action is that the person has promised something and then changed what they're doing. So if I guarantee you privacy and you sign up for a great free service, and later discover that it was basically the old bait and switch, then you have good reason to be upset.

    So the idea that if you don't like alligators you should avoid swamps is simplistic; if you were promised no swamps (cuz you were trying to avoid them because you don't like alligators) and then you find yourself getting eaten alive, I say you have cause.

  • by optimism ( 2183618 ) on Friday May 18, 2012 @09:00PM (#40047983)

    Some day, someone can explain to m what's wrong with that. Every ad network in the history of ever has done that, and even so, nobody has suffered a single ill consequence of it... that I know of.

    When your credit rating drops and your insurance premiums rise, because of your browsing patterns, or the post contents, or the risk-profile of your social-network acquaintances, you won't know that this is the reason.

    The corporations will only tell you your new lower credit rating, and only tell you that insurance rates went up. No explanation required.

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...