Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Conflict of Interest Derails UK Government Open Source Consultation

Comments Filter:
  • FTFA (Score:5, Insightful)

    by bmo (77928) on Friday April 27, 2012 @09:53AM (#39820255)

    "not been paid to specifically write their response to the Open Standards consultation but he is engaged to help them tease out the issues"

    Wow, what a bunch of political weasel wording by Hopkirk. It all depends on how "specific" Hopkirk defines "specifically." That's not just mere conflict of interest. That's conflict of interest and then still lying about it.

    --
    BMO

  • by gl4ss (559668) on Friday April 27, 2012 @10:07AM (#39820447) Homepage Journal

    and profits in pocket.

    not paid specifically to do that, but paid anyways. if he was going to continue to be paid depending on the results would have been the next question to ask.

"Don't talk to me about disclaimers! I invented disclaimers!" -- The Censored Hacker

Working...