Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Government The Internet United States Your Rights Online

Why CISPA Is a Really Bad Bill 142

Posted by Soulskill
from the must-be-the-comic-sans-font dept.
We've heard recently of CISPA, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, a bill currently making its way through Congress that many are calling the latest incarnation of SOPA. Reader SolKeshNaranek points out an article at Techdirt explaining exactly why this bill is bad, and how its backers are trying to deflect criticism by using language that's different and rather vague. Quoting: "The bill defines 'cybersecurity systems' and 'cyber threat information' as anything to do with protecting a network from: '(A) efforts to degrade, disrupt, or destroy such system or network; or (B) theft or misappropriation of private or government information, intellectual property, or personally identifiable information.' It's easy to see how that definition could be interpreted to include things that go way beyond network security — specifically, copyright policing systems at virtually any point along a network could easily qualify."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Why CISPA Is a Really Bad Bill

Comments Filter:
  • by suraj.sun (1348507) on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @07:49PM (#39638557) []

    Business Roundtable
    CTIA - The Wireless Association
    Cyber, Space & Intelligence Association
    Edison Electric
    The Financial Services Roundtable
    Independent Telephone & Telecommunications Alliance
    Information Technology Industry Council
    Internet Security Alliance
    Lockheed Martin
    National Cable & Telecommunications Association
    US Chamber of Commerce
    US Telecom - The Broadband Association

  • Re:Why? (Score:5, Informative)

    by jxander (2605655) on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @08:19PM (#39638847)

    Problem is: with whom do we replace them?

    For every Congressman you could hypothetically shitcan at a moment's notice, there are a dozen more equally corrupt politicians at the state level ready to take their place. And for every Governor, Mayor etc that gets the axe (or gets promoted into a recently vacated congressional seat) there will always be a Secretary of State, greasy lawyer, corrupt CEO, Community Organizer, or some guy named Moonbeam.

    The whole process is rotten to the core, and attracts like minded people into it's ranks. I see two possible outcomes, (1) some paradigm will shift and the process will slowly gravitate back towards honesty and intelligence with law-makers genuinely giving a crap about their constituents... or (2) it will continue to worsen until the populace cannot take it anymore, at which point things should get ... interesting.

  • by IonOtter (629215) on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @09:03PM (#39639221) Homepage

    That list is very, very short.

    Compare it to the list of interests that supported SOPA. []

    Found only two matches: National Cable & Telecommunications Association, and the US Chamber of Commerce. There were a few matches on the opposing side, but not many.

    Now we know who the real players are in the game of controlling the government.

... though his invention worked superbly -- his theory was a crock of sewage from beginning to end. -- Vernor Vinge, "The Peace War"