Why Tech Vendors Fund Patent Trolls 58
Lucas123 writes "Major tech vendors are funding patent trolls, companies that derive the bulk of their income, if not all of it, from licensing huge libraries of patents they hold as well as by suing companies that use their patents without permission, according to an investigation by Computerworld. Tech companies — including Apple and Micron — have railed against patent 'nuisance' lawsuits, only to fund or otherwise support some of the patent trolls. Because of patent trolls, more politely called mass patent aggregators, patent litigation has in part increased by more than 230% over the past 20 years. 'Most of the major tech companies are backing a troll in some way, probably financially,' says Thomas Ewing, an attorney who has authored reports on what he calls 'patent privateering.'"
Re:Laborless Capital (Score:4, Insightful)
I think this is what it looks like when the system values bureaucracy over results. Viva la Kafka!
Math Check.... (Score:5, Insightful)
"patent litigation has in part increased by more than 230% over the past 20 years."
Math check... a 4.2% increase, per year, over 20 years yields 230%.
Is 4.2% per year so much? Given the changes in technology in the past 20 years, that seems quite modest to me.
Re:The problem is obvious patents (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Math Check.... (Score:4, Insightful)
That's a really good point - thanks for making it.
And if this rate of increase continues into the future, where it approximately doubles every ten years, in 2020 we'll be 400% higher than 1990 and in 2030 we'll be at 800% and by 2040 we'll be at 1600% ...
As far as math goes, that's all fine. But behind those numbers we have to put resources, and resources come from meatspace, where there are physical limits to growth. In the finite world, continuous growth is just not sustainable. And even if it were, is this where we want to dedicate our resources?
Patent system broken (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:The problem is obvious patents (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Patent litigation trends (Score:4, Insightful)
NPEs win about 23% of the time overall, and PEs win about 39%
That's a very sad statistic for the patent office. It means they are rubber stamping far too many invalid patents. But you already knew that.
Re:Patent litigation trends (Score:3, Insightful)
That statistic tells you absolutely nothing about the validity (or otherwise) of the patents involved in litigation.
The numbers would include the successful bringing of an infringement action with respect to a perfectly valid patent, for example.
A declaration of invalidity is far from the only remedy available in patent litigation.