Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship Google Your Rights Online

Eric Schmidt: UN Treaty a 'Disaster' For the Internet 346

An anonymous reader writes "Internet freedom and innovation are at risk of being stifled by a new United Nations treaty that aims to bring in more regulation, Google's executive chairman Eric Schmidt has warned. In a question-and-answer session at Mobile World Congress 2012 on Tuesday, Schmidt said handing over control of things such as naming and DNS to the UN's International Telecommunications Union (ITU) would divide the internet, allowing it to be further broken into pieces regulated in different ways. 'That would be a disaster... To some, the openness and interoperability is one of the greatest achievements of mankind in our lifetime. Do not give that up easily. You will regret it. You will hate it, because all of a sudden all that freedom, all that flexibility, you'll find it shipped away for one good reason after another,' Schmidt said. 'I cannot be more emphatic. Be very, very careful about moves which seem logical, but have the effect of balkanising the internet,' he added, urging everyone to strongly resist the moves."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Eric Schmidt: UN Treaty a 'Disaster' For the Internet

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Another reason (Score:5, Informative)

    by PatDev ( 1344467 ) on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @04:05PM (#39201383)

    There have only been two - Vietnam and Korea

    My current political knowledge and world history are insufficient to comment on the exact number of wars that have occurred since 1945, but I'm quite certain it's more than those two. I think perhaps you mis-interpreted the issue as the number of wars the U.S. has been involved in.

    And that's not really true. Yes, our executives have recently avoided the legitimacy of getting a declaration of war before mounting a large-scale military invasion of a nation, doing combat with the armed forces of that nation, and ultimately replacing the government of that nation. However, just because they haven't had the integrity to use the word "war" doesn't mean we didn't go to war - it just means our Congress should be upset that its constitutional role was usurped by another branch of government.

  • by mounthood ( 993037 ) on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @05:52PM (#39202671)

    I don't think the UN would consider PIPA or SOPA. See: U.N. Report Declares Internet Access a Human Right [wired.com]

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @07:18PM (#39203509)

    We already did, by erasing the debt the UK owed the US after WW2 from the lend lease program.

    No, the UK paid off each and every cent of that debt, the final payment being made in 2007.

Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.

Working...