Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Facebook Crime Government Security Social Networks United States IT

Facebook Has 25 People Dedicated To Handling Gov't Info Requests 125

nonprofiteer writes "A profile of Facebook's CSO reveals that his 70-person security team includes 25 people dedicated solely to handling information requests from law enforcement. They get thousands of calls and e-mails from authorities each week, though Facebook requires police to get a warrant for anything beyond a subscriber's name, email and IP address. CSO Joe Sullivan says that some government agency tried to push Facebook to start collecting more information about their users for the benefit of authorities: 'Recently a government agency wanted us to start logging information we don't log. We told them we wouldn't start logging that piece of data because we don't need it to provide a good product. We talked to our general counsel. The law is not black-and-white. That agency thinks they can compel us to. We told them to go to court. They haven't done that yet.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Facebook Has 25 People Dedicated To Handling Gov't Info Requests

Comments Filter:
  • by elgo ( 1751690 ) on Friday February 24, 2012 @05:43PM (#39153183)
    So Facebook provides all the necessary info for Law Enforcement, but doesn't engage in detailed logging, probably because it is too expensive and as the gentleman said, it doesn't yet fit in with FB's business model. Still, they provide peoples' names, emails, and IP addresses for Law Enforcement, so really they cooperate with the fuzz as much as is needed. Nice damage control, making themselves out to be standing up to Big Brother. Then again, IDNRTFA, and with the way sunmaries have been lately, this could be an article about My Little Pony, for all I know...
  • Re:Wait, what? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Hatta ( 162192 ) on Friday February 24, 2012 @05:55PM (#39153349) Journal

    If they were REALLY interested in protecting the privacy of their users, they'd publish any requests they recieved from law enforcement.

  • Re:Wait, what? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 24, 2012 @05:58PM (#39153397)

    Really? So if someone falsely accused you of pedophilia, you'd want that information request published regardless of the fact you're innocent and there's nothing to find?

  • by Wintermute__ ( 22920 ) on Friday February 24, 2012 @06:02PM (#39153437)

    What could possibly be so privacy-invading, not-worth-the-disk-space-to-log-it crazy that Facebook doesn't already log it? These people make tons of money selling every minute bit of data and metrics about their suckers^H^H^H^H^H^H^Husers that they can possibly hoover up. What could it be that even *they* wouldn't want to log?

    Just goes to show, there is no boundary that some government agency won't want to cross to invade your privacy.

  • Re:Window Dressing (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 24, 2012 @06:20PM (#39153611)

    Interpret Facebook's statements literally and narrowly. They haven't gone to court. They said nothing about a National Security Letter, or similar.

  • by Maltheus ( 248271 ) on Friday February 24, 2012 @06:53PM (#39153921)

    Why should FB have to pay 25 people a year to do the government's dirty work? Companies should be able to submit a research bill to the government for these kinds of requests. There's no better check on power than a budget.

  • Re:"that agency" (Score:2, Interesting)

    by PolygamousRanchKid ( 1290638 ) on Friday February 24, 2012 @06:54PM (#39153927)

    I'd be interested to know which one...

    That interest, is, in fact, a criminal offense.

    CIA, FBI, DHS, [redacted]?

    The NSA used to be called "No Such Agency". Maybe knowledge of the agency, itself, is secret.

    "We are from the government. Give us your data!"
    "Uh, which agency . . . ?"
    "That's secret."
    "Well, how do I find out about the agency . . . ?"
    "You need a security clearance."
    "And how do I get one . . . ?"
    "That's secret."

    . . . etc. . . .

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...