RIAA Wants To Scrap Anti-Piracy OPEN Act 268
silentbrad writes with these selections from an article at Ars Technica: "The Recording Industry Association of America found itself in an unusual position this week: opposing an anti-piracy bill that's gaining momentum in Congress ... the RIAA argues the bill won't be effective at shutting down rogue sites. The trade group warns of 'indefinite delays' as claims of infringement are investigated. And it complains that the process envisioned by OPEN would allow for 'endless submissions by parties such as Google,' further gumming up the process. All the while, the alleged rogue site would be able to continue operating. The RIAA also warns that the need to hire an attorney to navigate the ITC's arcane legal process will 'put justice out of reach for small business American victims of IP theft.' The trade group complains that sites aren't held responsible for the infringing activities of their users, a rule the trade group says 'excuses willful blindness and outright complicity in illegal activity.' RIAA also says it's 'virtually impossible' to prove that a site infringed willfully, as OPEN requires."
Finally! (Score:4, Interesting)
Still want to kill the internet (Score:5, Interesting)
The trade group complains that sites aren't held responsible for the infringing activities of their users, a rule the trade group says 'excuses willful blindness and outright complicity in illegal activity.'
This is, again, the scariest part of their campaign. The ability of sites to not be liable (unless they ignore takedown requests) is the best part of the (otherwise pretty crappy) DMCA, and the XXAA want to undo it. They don't care in the least that it would end every social collaboration web site (like slashdot), because they think their old business models (pay the radio, tv, and newspaper to advertise, then reap profit via local stores and theaters) would spring back to life if we didn't waste all our time and money on the internet.
Seriously, the only way this will end is if someone puts a bullet in them. And by bullet, I mean hostile takeover. And by someone, I mean Google. And if Apple just so happens to take over another one of them a few days later, oh well. Maybe Microsoft would even like to own a music label? Hell, isn't EMI suffering and looking for a buyer?
If the RIAA is against it... (Score:5, Interesting)
... I'm suddenly very much for it.
Can't prove it was willful? Don't shut it down. (Score:5, Interesting)
RIAA also says it's 'virtually impossible' to prove that a site infringed willfully, as OPEN requires.
If it's too hard to prove that someone is guilty, then maybe - just maybe - they aren't.
They insist on chasing down the wrong people - innocent websites - and they complain that it's hard to prove guilt?
On the other hand, it would be trivial to prove that a user infringed willfully... but there's very little money to be made in that.
Re:*Stomps foot* (Score:5, Interesting)
it was never about protecting artists, it was never about doing the right thing, it was always about control
Strangely enough, Megaupload was shut down just when it was about to launch a music service that would have paid 90% of earnings to artists [jacehallshow.com].
Re:*Stomps foot* (Score:5, Interesting)
I didn't read TFA, TFS was bad enough. Damned MAFIAA.
The trade group warns of 'indefinite delays' as claims of infringement are investigated
What the parent poster said. The RIAA would rather shut you down without any pesky investigations.
allow for 'endless submissions by parties such as Google,' further gumming up the process.
But heaven forbid that sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander. "Rules can't apply to US, only Google."
The RIAA also warns that the need to hire an attorney to navigate the ITC's arcane legal process will 'put justice out of reach for small business American victims of IP theft.
That's as far as I could go before blowing up. These lying asshats REALLY piss me off. First, if I'm going to defend my copyright I'm going to need a lawyer. Period. Doesn't matter if I'm one middle class guy or the RIAA.
Then there's "IP theft". The only theft of IP is the RIAA and MPAA stealing the public domain by bribing Congress. A copyright does NOT confer ownership, it confers a limited time monopoly on publication; the public is the one who owns it. All of us own it. It isn't the RIAA's property, it's ours. They're a bunch of God damned thieves who call their paying customers thieves.