USPTO Declares Invalid Third of Three Critical Rambus Patents 113
slew writes "This is a followup to this earlier story about 2 of 3 of Rambus's 'critical' patents being invalidated. Apparently now it's a hat-trick."
There's something that seems unsavory and wasteful about a business environment in which a company's stock value "fluctuates sharply on its successes and failures in patent litigation and licensing." The linked article offers a brief but decent summary of the way Rambus has profited over the years from these now-invalidated patents.
Slashdot declares invalid split infinitive (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Parser error. (Score:5, Funny)
1 and 2 were already invalidated.
The third of 3, i.e. the last one, has now also been invalidated.
You're welcome.