Look Ma, I'm Getting Arrested! 238
robotissues writes "Cnet reviews 'I'm Getting Arrested,' an Android app that alerts your lawyer and loved ones if you have been arrested while peacefully demonstrating. The app makes it easy to broadcast a message via SMS in case all hell breaks loose."
All Hell? (Score:5, Insightful)
I think when all hell breaks loose, it looks like Darfur, not Occupy Wallstreet.
The good news is... (Score:1, Insightful)
Corporate shills! (Score:3, Insightful)
This is awesome. So while I'm out protesting corporations, I can use my phone, produced by a corporation, to notify my family that I've been arrested. Maybe I can get one of them to bring me a frapacino [motifake.com].
police state (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Corporate shills! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:All Hell? (Score:4, Insightful)
Everyone else uses the phrase as a relative term. But go ahead and complain that your unique language choices aren't globally accepted.
Personally I think the phrase should only be used to refer to situations in which some crazy vampire opens a hellmouth, but I don't complain when nobody agrees with me.
Re:Corporate shills! (Score:5, Insightful)
Perhaps (as your post seems to infer) everyone should just STFU and accept the wonderful economic condition the US is in, due in no small part by the factors mentioned above, eh? I'm sure "Corporate America" thanks you for your support.
go long on guillotines (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:All Hell? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Corporate shills! (Score:4, Insightful)
Protests such as this don't serve to resolve any problems. They only serve to draw attention to the problem. Would one, ten, or ten million people standing around complaining about a problem make a difference? Not really.
It would be more effective if those protesters, their friends, and their families, all cashed in their stock, paid off their loans (so as not to pay further interest), closed their bank accounts, and effectively said "hell no, we won't let you have any more of our money!"
I've been doing my part towards this. I am open about problems I've had with banks. A recent even was with Wells Fargo. They started charging me fees which were contrary to federal law. I went to the bank first to discuss it. They refused to accept the fact that they were breaking the law. I filed a federal complaint over it. When faced with this they begrudgingly agreed to waive the fees, but still refused to admit that they were at fault. Basically, they claimed it was my fault that they were illegally applying fees. In the end, I closed my account without needing to pay the fees. Several friends did the same. I'm just one person, and it was only a handful of accounts that were closed because of this. If every person who was wronged did the same thing, it would have a severe impact on banks and other companies that are viewed as "doing wrong". These companies can only thrive for as long as they have these huge customer bases, that pay fees and interest.
In other words, don't complain about the problem. Do something about the problem. Stop paying them to be the problem.
Re:Corporate shills! (Score:4, Insightful)
See, much of my retirement is tied up in Wall St and I'm the working class schlub they are supposed to be protesting for. They are NOT helping!
That's a nice insurance policy Wall Street has. If the serfs get too uppity, just crash their retirement. That way you get a country full of Uncle Toms running to prop up the system. Aren't you upset about being in such a bind that you can't even speak your mind for fear of losing your retirement?
Putting your retirement in the stock market is a stupid idea to begin with. Workers should be paid enough that they can save what they need to retire on, without being forced to gamble, or fund unethical behavior.
Taking down corporations is not going to improve our economic situation
Very few people want to take down corporations. We just want them to play fair. They should pay their workers a fair share of the profits. The officers of corporations should go to jail when the corporation commits crimes. And they shouldn't have undue influence over the political process.
Do you disagree?
Then again, I don't see these guys as Nobel Laureate Economists.
At least one Nobel Laureate economist has strongly supported the economic ideas behind OWS.