Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Facebook Networking Patents Privacy The Internet News Your Rights Online

Facebook Files For a Patent To Track Its Users On Other Sites 133

suraj.sun sends word that a recent Facebook patent application details specific methods for tracking its users while they're using other websites. Michael Arrington pointed out over the weekend that this follows explicit statements from Facebook employees that the social networking giant has "no interest in tracking people." Quoting the Patent Application: "In one embodiment, a method is described for tracking information about the activities of users of a social networking system while on another domain. The method includes maintaining a profile for each of one or more users of the social networking system, each profile identifying a connection to one or more other users of the social networking system and including information about the user. The method additionally includes receiving one or more communications from a third-party website having a different domain than the social network system, each message communicating an action taken by a user of the social networking system on the third-party website. The method additionally includes logging the actions taken on the third-party website in the social networking system, each logged action including information about the action."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Facebook Files For a Patent To Track Its Users On Other Sites

Comments Filter:
  • I gave up... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by gfxguy ( 98788 ) on Monday October 03, 2011 @02:54PM (#37592168)
    It was interesting and nice to connect to a lot of my old high school buddies, but I don't care where people are going for dinner, or bragging about the vacation they're on (how dumb is that, anyway?), so I logged out and deleted all my cookies. Don't know that I'll completely delete my account, but I'm not missing it.
  • by GameboyRMH ( 1153867 ) <gameboyrmh&gmail,com> on Monday October 03, 2011 @03:13PM (#37592428) Journal

    The claim that they don't track users runs on CNN where all the Facebook users see it while the patent news runs on Slashdot, where the security experts who are already seen by their friends and family as tinfoil hatters see it. It's not illogical. It's a calculated lie.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 03, 2011 @03:16PM (#37592458)

    WHY I also set myself up the way I do online layering of security measures, in:

    ---

    1.) Custom HOSTS files (mine's currently 1,586,590++ entries strong vs. known malicious sites/servers, botnet C&C servers, bogus adbanners (& ads in general) servers, phishing + spamming sites, & for security's sake alone (I get more out of it speedwise too via "hardcoding fav. sites" into it also, avoiding DNS redirected-poisoned dns servers, & getting there faster by avoiding them totally (their slower lookup vs. my SSD based & cached ones from HOSTS, locally, instead of slower remotely)).

    2.) DNSBL filtering DNS servers (NortonDNS, OpenDNS, ScrubIT DNS are all in my IP stack dns servers list, & in my router-firewall too).

    3.) Firewall IP rules tables (to catch IP addresses more than host-domain named ones - HOSTS does that too)

    4.) IP Security Policies (Via Windows NT-based OS' security policies (I do both domain & local level here)).

    5.) OS security hardening -> http://www.google.com/search?sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&site=&source=hp&q=%22HOW+TO+Secure+Windows+2000%2FXP%22&btnG=Search [google.com] , which includes remotely listening services if not needed especially &/or potentially vulnerable ones + shares remotely solicited.

    6.) IP stack hardening -> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff648853.aspx [microsoft.com]

    ---

    ( & FAR more in the way of "layered-security/defense-in-depth" stuff, such as using Opera 11.51 to setup a GLOBAL policy for all sites to not use javascript, iframes, cookies, plugins, java etc. "everywhere", & only set it up, via Opera's "By Site Preferences" exceptions list, & only for sites that actual DEMAND their usages (think ecommerce sites) only - PLUS, using its urlfilter.ini file, custom .pac files, & custom CSS sheets )

    I.E.-> To simply stay away from what makes you "sick online" by lessening its attack surface area + tools it can use against you (as well as for you, the double-edged sword that any scripted document, yes, including HTML ones, can be)

    Why?

    * See my p.s. below...

    APK

    P.S.=> I do ALL that, & more, just to avoid:

    ---

    A.) Tracking (not using javascript @ all, or using sites that 'track you' not only thru their own mass, but thru the mass of other sites too? For Pete's sake, lol, 'enough already')

    B.) To avoid malware

    C.) To avoid losses of speed & to gain back loads of it too!

    D.) To obtain great security for decades online

    E.) To get MORE OF WHAT I PAY FOR OUT OF POCKET!

    ---

    Is why, & I have for DECADES now (so have others in the url's above)...haven't been infected online since 1996 in fact because of the above & can make a DSL connection seem like high-end cable or FIOS for websurfing online... +, 4 FREE, & the above's just a part of the "how" is all...

    ... apk

  • Well, yeah. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by thejoelpatrol ( 764408 ) on Monday October 03, 2011 @05:14PM (#37593618)
    If you're still listening to anything Facebook says, I don't know what else to tell you. This is hardly the first time they've lied about something like this. They say things that are so implausible that they aren't worth listening to. They want every piece of data. Period. They will do whatever they can to get more data on people. Any time they say something to the contrary, they are lying.

Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.

Working...