Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Cellphones Government Privacy The Courts United States

Surveillance Case May Reveal FBI Cellphone Tracking Techniques 57

Posted by timothy
from the public-records-act dept.
glittermage writes "The WSJ reports on an ongoing case about alleged 'Hacker' Daniel David Rigmaiden, regarding the government's tools used to track mobile devices with or without a warrant. The judge may allow Daniel to defend himself against the government's claims by putting the technology into the light. Sounds good to me."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Surveillance Case May Reveal FBI Cellphone Tracking Techniques

Comments Filter:
  • Or not (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Hatta (162192) on Thursday September 22, 2011 @04:14PM (#37483966) Journal

    The judge could just as easily deny him an opportunity to defend himself based on unspecified "national security" fears.

  • Re:Or not (Score:4, Interesting)

    by AngryNick (891056) on Thursday September 22, 2011 @05:04PM (#37484624) Homepage Journal
    Interesting timing. The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments on the question of GPS tracking without a warrant [supremecourt.gov] on November 8th. I suspect the ruling could be applied to this kind of technology. Granted, one is "passive" tracking (the person owns the tracked device) and the other "active" (the government attaches the device to the person), but I see similarities in how the use of tracking technology in general impacts society's expectation of privacy.

    Civics homework: Defend your position on how the 4th amendment [wikipedia.org] protects/allows cell phone tracking of suspected criminals.

APL is a write-only language. I can write programs in APL, but I can't read any of them. -- Roy Keir