ToS Violations No Longer a Crime (On Their Own) 162
nonprofiteer writes "The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act previously made 'unauthorized access to a computer system' a crime — meant to apply to hackers, it also criminalized violations of a website's ToS or of a workplace's computer policies. The law is being changed to make the crime a felony rather than a misdemeanor, which led some to worry about the potential for its abuse. However, Senators Franken and Grassley added an amendment (PDF) to exempt violations of ToS and employer policies from the lists of felony activity. w00t for common sense."
Re:Sorry but.... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Sorry but.... (Score:4, Informative)
Franken might be against the whole damned thing, but in favor of putting in the amendment because he thinks the entire bill will likely pass and he wants to make it suck less.
And the whole point of the amendment is that TOS violations won't be a felony.
Re:Sorry but.... (Score:4, Informative)
The law that mad it a misdemeanor was already on the books. Did Franken vote for it? I rather doubt it, he hasn't been in office all that long, and the act is rather old. When you get elected to a senatorial post you don't get to review all the old laws on the books and call for a revote.
Re:Sorry but.... (Score:4, Informative)
No, they changed the definition of the crime itself to exclude violations of TOSes and similar. Read the amendment, it's like a whole paragraph of reading.. Or, ya know, just scream and cry that your rights are being violated reflexively.
Re:Still crimes, even on their own (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Sorry but.... (Score:0, Informative)
I agree.
Can we also throw out all the laws that were passed by Democrat whores?
Or do you think that laws passed by them are "All Good"?
Re:Still crimes, even on their own (Score:5, Informative)
Here's the text of the current law:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1030.html [cornell.edu]
(go yell at Cornell if you think it is not an accurate reflection of the current U.S. code, I don't care)
Section 1030(e)(6) defines the term âoeexceeds authorized accessâ as used in the law. The amendment to the proposed bill changes the definition explicitly to exclude TOS violations as a sole basis for determining unauthorized access.