Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Censorship Communications Networking The Internet United States Your Rights Online

US Funding Stealth Internets to Circumvent Repressive Regimes 289

snydeq writes "The Obama administration is leading a global effort to deploy 'shadow' Internet and mobile phone systems that dissidents can use to undermine repressive governments that seek to silence them by censoring or shutting down telecommunications networks. According to a report from CBS News: '...by the end of the year the State Department will have spent $70 million on efforts to provide alternate pathways for dissidents to access the Internet and telecommunications services. One group received $2 million to develop an "Internet in a suitcase" that could be easily carried and set up in a foreign country.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Funding Stealth Internets to Circumvent Repressive Regimes

Comments Filter:
  • Is it just me... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Max Romantschuk ( 132276 ) <max@romantschuk.fi> on Sunday June 12, 2011 @12:58PM (#36418320) Homepage

    ...or doesn't this seem a little hypocritical in light of how the whole Wikileaks thing has been handled?

  • by Finallyjoined!!! ( 1158431 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @01:01PM (#36418348)
    What would happen if there were, just for arguments sake, dissident Americans........
    Pause..
  • by rubycodez ( 864176 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @01:01PM (#36418350)
    is someone making a package for us to circumvent our ever-repressive government in the Demokratik Polize State of Amerika ?
  • by gilbert644 ( 1515625 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @01:02PM (#36418354)
    Every government limits freedom, its inherent to its role.
  • I've read that parts of Anonymous also work on projects in this same vein. And that same facet of Anonymous is who carries out the DDoS attacks and other various distressing things. I wonder if the irony of sharing goals with Anonymous is completely lost on the US government. I expect probably so. Freedom abroad, a slow slide towards facism at home, that'll be the way of it.

  • by ArhcAngel ( 247594 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @01:17PM (#36418452)
    At first blush yes. But what they don't tell you is they have a back door into this system so it won't work in the US.
  • by Haedrian ( 1676506 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @01:17PM (#36418456)

    America the Land of Liberty*. Freeing the people from oppression**

    *Note: Liberty is only available other countries.

    **Does not count for people living in America

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 12, 2011 @01:27PM (#36418514)

    They're not supplying freedom, they're supplying a means of communication that makes monitoring/shaping/manipulating events abroad easier and safer.

  • by amiga3D ( 567632 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @01:36PM (#36418576)

    Indeed. Government is a necessary evil. That government is best which governs least. The kind of thing you don't hear much anymore as it's gone out of style.

  • by obarthelemy ( 160321 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @01:38PM (#36418594)

    we'd call those terrorists, and patriot-act them.

  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @01:45PM (#36418648)
    It hasn't gone out of style, it's just plain wrong. The world is a different place then when Thoreau wrote that (and it wasn't too close to the mark then). Do you honestly think there is anything else besides a strong central government that can stand up to mega-corps? Do you honestly want those few mega-corps (and their oligarch CEOs, kings of the new millennium) running things. Power is going to concentrate whether you like it or not. I'll take my chances with Obama over the Koch brothers any day.
  • by Midnight Thunder ( 17205 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @01:45PM (#36418660) Homepage Journal

    The sad thing is recent behaviour of both democrats and republicans show that it doesn't make a difference which party rules. They just screw their population in slightly different ways, unless you have the cash to pay to screw.

    The recent problem has been the heavy handed shutting down of sites without due process. Given the number of problem sites I can understand why they want to do this, but at the same time shouldn't there be some sort of transparency. Also, it would be nice if the US crack down of sites only affected sites in the USA and didn't impact what other countries see.

  • by hitmark ( 640295 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @01:54PM (#36418744) Journal

    I think the inherent issue here is approaching government as a "us vs them" issue, rather then considering that government, at least in a representative democracy (take the "it is a republic" somewhere else), is by the people for the people. As such, it is there to uphold the rules that the majority of the nation agrees upon (you anarchists and libertarians can keep quiet for now). The last couple of decades however it appears that corporations and other special interest groups have managed to co-opt this system. As such we are seeing laws being written that will make the majority of the people criminals. Did we not learn a thing from the failed attempt at prohibition?

  • by atriusofbricia ( 686672 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @02:50PM (#36419172) Journal

    America the Land of Liberty*. Freeing the people from oppression**

    *Note: Liberty is only available other countries.

    **Does not count for people living in America

    I'll bite.. Will I get thrown in jail for saying Obama is a dick? No? Oh, so I suppose I'll get sent to GITMO for saying that the government is crap? Won't happen?

    I know, I'll get thrown in jail for traveling to another state without permission.. oh.. not happening either?

    Prevented by the government from visiting or moving to another country? Damn, nope.. not that either..

    Disallowed from owning guns, property, practicing my religion or protesting peacefully?

    I'll find random politically objectionable websites filtered on a national scale? Well damn, not that either.

    So what exactly is this oppression you're speaking of? I'm not saying it's perfect, but where is better and more free?

  • Re:propaganda (Score:3, Insightful)

    by thrich81 ( 1357561 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @03:33PM (#36419490)
    To some extent I can see where you are coming from. I was on some international travel in 2003-2004 and it was striking how different the Iraq coverage was by CNN International vs. the domestic CNN feed. However, don't blame the government for that -- the vast majority of people want to hear news which reinforces their already held opinions of things (and it has always been that way). The big news organizations are there to make money (not so true 50 years ago, but there really was no 'golden age' of unbiased news reporting) and for that they sell their audiences what they want to hear, in any country or society nowadays. Don't blame the government for that -- look around and blame your fellow citizens and "news consumers". There is plenty of news and evidence available which puts into question the official reports and societal held opinions, if people are willing to just pay attention. And the fricking "US is the Great Satan" meme is just as bogus as any of them so give that a rest. You don't need better governments, you need better citizens, and most of them aren't willing to be so.
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Sunday June 12, 2011 @05:24PM (#36419826)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...