Crowdsourcing Analysis of the Palin Email Trove 284
itwbennett writes "Surely you've got better things to do this weekend than read 24,000 pages of Sarah Palin's email. But just in case you don't, the NY Times is looking for volunteers to help 'identify interesting and newsworthy e-mails, people and events that we may want to highlight.' And, for your easy reference, MSNBC has posted the complete collection online."
Re:volunteers? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:WTF? (Score:2, Informative)
He was magna cum laude. Verified by Harvard. Not as high as summa, but the point remains that he was top 10% of his class at Harvard.
Re:Press needs to examine its life (Score:1, Informative)
This is /., not Digg. (Score:0, Informative)
You seem to be lost. This is Slashdot, not Digg. When we agree with somebody, we don't say that we "dug" their post.
Re:WTF? (Score:5, Informative)