Advocacy Group Files FCC Complaint Over Verizon Tethering Ban 190
Hugh Pickens writes "Cnet reports that the advocacy group Free Press has filed a complaint with the FCC that argues Verizon Wireless shouldn't be allowed to block tethering apps that let people connect their computers to the Internet through their phones' 4G wireless data network. 'This practice restricts consumer choice and hinders innovation regardless of which carrier adopts such policies, but when Verizon Wireless employs these restrictions in connection with its LTE network, it also violates the Federal Communications Commission's rules,' says the group. Those rules say Verizon 'shall not deny, limit, or restrict the ability of their customers to use the devices and applications of their choice.' Google has made tethering apps unavailable through the Android Market for some phones that use wireless services from Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile, saying in May it did so at the behest of carriers."
FCC: Corporations working for Corporations (Score:4, Insightful)
At one time, AT&T charged extra for modem use (Score:5, Insightful)
They can do as they please.
People who tether are not harming the network that the carriers own. What is the carrier's complaint, and how does it square up with the Carterfone decision [wikipedia.org]? At one time, AT&T charged extra for the "tethering" of the day, namely the privilege to use a modem on a phone line. It also limited modems to using acoustic coupler technology. Had this continued, had Carterfone not opened up the market to equipment in the customer's control, we very likely wouldn't have had home Internet access in the 1990s.
Sure that makes sense (Score:2, Insightful)
If they didn't the mifi would go byebye
https://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/mobilebroadband/?page=products_mifi
Re:They own the network. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Well duh. (Score:2, Insightful)
+1 ironic for misspelling moron.
Re:Community workarounds ? (Score:2, Insightful)
Or to make it simpler, just make some nice OSS apps that destroy Google's lockdown on Android so that we who pay $70-90 a month for a 3G/4G cell plan (individual, not family plan) can rightfully use the service we pay through our teeth for ?
The irony to this question is that Google has done a lot to subvert the normal lockdowns that had been a staple of the US wireless telcom industry.