Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Twitter Social Networks The Courts United Kingdom

Twitter Reveals User Details In UK Libel Case 127

Posted by timothy
from the phrase-your-subpoena-in-140-chars-or-less dept.
whoever57 writes "In a case that could have implications for the Ryan Giggs affair, Twitter revealed user details in response to a legal action filed in San Mateo county, CA by lawyers representing South Tyneside council. The alleged libel refers to critical comments made via Twitter. It is possible that one of the people making the critical comments is one of the council members."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Twitter Reveals User Details In UK Libel Case

Comments Filter:
  • Re:also, details (Score:5, Interesting)

    by DrgnDancer (137700) on Sunday May 29, 2011 @10:14AM (#36279214) Homepage

    I believe truth is a defense in in US libel cases, which is where the case is apparently being tried. According to the Journalism about.com article [about.com]: "Libel is by definition false. Anything that is provably true cannot be libelous. " I'll grant you that "about.com" is not he most reliable source ever, but I doubt they'd get this wrong. I realize that in the UK truth is not a Libel defense (which makes no sense to me at all, but no one asked me), but in California it almost certainly is.

It is masked but always present. I don't know who built to it. It came before the first kernel.