Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Android Google Oracle The Courts Apache Your Rights Online

Oracle Subpoenas Apache Foundation In Google Suit 98

Posted by CmdrTaco
from the battle-of-the-paperwork dept.
angry tapir writes "Oracle has subpoenaed the Apache Software Foundation in connection with its ongoing intellectual property suit against Google. Oracle filed suit against Google in August, alleging that its Android mobile operating system infringes on seven of Oracle's Java patents. Google has denied any wrongdoing. The subpoena, which was received by ASF on Monday, seeks 'the production of documents related to the use of Apache Harmony code in the Android software platform, and the unsuccessful attempt by Apache to secure an acceptable license to the Java SE Technology Compatibility Kit.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Oracle Subpoenas Apache Foundation In Google Suit

Comments Filter:
  • by poetmatt (793785) on Thursday May 05, 2011 @11:02AM (#36035394) Journal

    considering that apache is pretty openly documented, subpoena'ing them is probably mostly useless. I mean they could probably point Oracle to their own wiki.

  • -5 Rep (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jimmerz28 (1928616) on Thursday May 05, 2011 @11:19AM (#36035630)

    I wonder if anyone at Oracle realizes how they're continually mangling their image? I didn't ask if they care, simply if they realize it.

  • by John Hasler (414242) on Thursday May 05, 2011 @11:27AM (#36035700) Homepage

    The court wants to see the documents as delivered by Apache, not copies that Oracle's lawyers claim to have found on some Web site. Oracle also wants to see private communications between Apache and IBM. This is all very routine and reasonable in the circumstance. Apache will be compensated for their expenses and they can ask the judge to seal anything that they don't want in the public record.

  • by DrXym (126579) on Thursday May 05, 2011 @11:31AM (#36035764)

    Code written for Android can't be run on another platform without rewriting large portions of the code. In essence, it's basically just the same sort of additions that Microsoft did and got tons of bad press about.

    Android application code really doesn't care where it's running. It's running on a VM after all. If someone ported Dalvik to another platform, Android apps would run there too. In fact RIM have done that already, porting Dalvik over QNX. If they can do it then it's clearly not proprietary or lock-in. I'd actually like to see Dalvik ported in this way since it would speed up development no end and might prove useful for other purposes

    As for Microsoft's issues with Java, it's not the same at all. First Dalvik / Android are not Java. Never have been, never claimed to be. It's always been made explicitly clear that devs write with the Java language but the target is not a JVM.

Be sociable. Speak to the person next to you in the unemployment line tomorrow.

Working...