Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy Social Networks Idle Your Rights Online

Man Creates "Creepy" Stalking App 142

An anonymous reader writes "Creepy, a package described as a 'geolocation information aggregator,' is turning heads in privacy circles, but should people be worried? Yiannis Kakavas explains why he developed his scary stalking application. Creepy is a software package for Linux or Windows — with a Mac OS X port in the works — that aims to gather public information on a targeted individual via social networking services in order to pinpoint their location. It's remarkably efficient at its job, even in its current early form, and certainly lives up to its name when you see it in use for the first time."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Man Creates "Creepy" Stalking App

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Ummmm (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 31, 2011 @04:26AM (#35675694)

    Yes, I would also like more people to make this distinction. However, I think anonymity is more important than privacy. Either one is enough. With privacy, I can do what I want and noone will know. With anonymity people will know, but it won't matter since they won't know who I am. So the question becomes which one we will be able to rely on in the future. How easy is it for one to have privacy or anonymity?

    With email providers and facebook handing out user data left and right, it's easy to know what a person is doing. And while it's not exactly legal to spy on people, spy cameras and wiretaps certainly make it easy.

    If I wanted to become anonymous, though, all I would need to do is leave my cellphone at home and only use cash. On the internet, use TOR. If I were to do this, it would be impossible for anyone to identify me, be it legal or not. And that is why I believe in anonymity more than privacy.

    Granted, this could only be done occasionaly, and I'm not saying privacy shouldn't be defended. On the contrary, since anonymity is always possible, privacy is what needs defending most.

  • by blanks ( 108019 ) on Thursday March 31, 2011 @04:47AM (#35675788) Homepage Journal
    Why are people saying this is a privacy issue? It's not. It uses publicly available information that the person freely posts online for the general public to read. Its like saying articles posted in the New York Times is private information of the authors who write for it. This program dosen't even do anything cool like make HTTP requests from state / city govermently run publicly available data.

    There are all ready existing applications out there that have all the features this software has and much much more.

Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.

Working...