Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship Education Facebook Government United States Your Rights Online

US Ed Dept Demanding Principals Censor More 493

Toe, The writes "Education Department officials are threatening school principals with lawsuits if they fail to monitor and curb students' lunchtime chat and evening Facebook time for expressing ideas and words that are deemed to be harassment of some students. Under the new interpretation of civil rights laws, principals and their schools are legally liable if they fail to curb 'harassment' of students, even if it takes place outside the school, on Facebook or in private conversation. When children are concerned, where is the line between protection and censorship?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Ed Dept Demanding Principals Censor More

Comments Filter:
  • Ludicrous (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 17, 2011 @05:27AM (#35513848)

    On the one hand we teach kids about the Constitution and Bill of Rights. On the other hand, we tell them "Hey johhny - what you say can get you in trouble if you make fun of that fat kid in the playground...

    Whatever happened to "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me?" Have we become such a bunch of pussies that we can't even deal with having people call us bad names? What ever happened to "hey - here's two pairs of boxing gloves - go behind the gym and work it out?"

    And finally, doesn't the Dept of Ed have ANYTHING else to deal with besides this BS?

  • Re:Ludicrous (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Hazel Bergeron ( 2015538 ) on Thursday March 17, 2011 @05:32AM (#35513874) Journal

    Whatever happened to "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me?"

    I want to put an early Godwin in this thread: Hitler happened. The nastiest people don't hurt anyone directly. They merely influence people's opinion.

    The US has the most powerful propaganda machine on the planet. Do you discount this entirely? Is the brain not just another organ which can be trained in a particular direction?

    What ever happened to "hey - here's two pairs of boxing gloves - go behind the gym and work it out?"

    Are you serious? The solution to bullies is to get physically fit and beat them up? Self-defence is entirely acceptable [dailymotion.com], but corporal punishment is not justice.

  • by TheTurtlesMoves ( 1442727 ) on Thursday March 17, 2011 @05:40AM (#35513906)
    You made the fundamentally flawed assumption that parents want to raise their kids. They don't*, they want the government to do it and they want to bitch about what a bad job the government does too.

    * OK so there are plenty of parents that do raise their own kids, but this article not really about them.
  • by perpetual pessimist ( 1245416 ) on Thursday March 17, 2011 @05:42AM (#35513918)

    It's always been difficult to learn about "the land of the free" in an institution where you (the students) are forced by law to go there whether you want to or not.

    Excellent training ground for applied sarcasm and irony appreciation, though.

  • by Dutchmaan ( 442553 ) on Thursday March 17, 2011 @05:45AM (#35513940) Homepage
    We keep on addressing effect after effect, when we need to be addressing the cause of the problems. Our problems don't stem from Facebook or music or video games, they come from the 'values' in our society. Our 'me first' attitude of competition is coming home to roost. Don't like bullying, well guess what, it's been taught to us from day one to 'win' and to kick someone when they're down so we can stay on top. From kids to corporate america to congress we need a values 'regime change'. Imagine what our country would be like if we were taught from day one to think of the other guy first.. and to help people succeed so that they can be around to help us when we're down. Negative reinforcement from the time we're kids to young adult hood to the workplace... and people wonder why everyone is always afraid these days. I think my boss summed it up for me one day when talking about the company.. he said "It's all punishment and no reward." seems like a fair assessment of our society.
  • by Manip ( 656104 ) on Thursday March 17, 2011 @06:01AM (#35514038)
    1969. When free speech in schools could be curtailed if it "substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others." Since then it has been further limited. 1988, school newspapers censored, and 2007 suspending a student for wearing an offensive t-shirt OFF school premises.

    I think it is an interesting area for debate, particularly when state education is legally required. But then again I guess teachers need to have some level of control. I think the most controversial area is if school should have any input into what students do in their own time rather than the police.
  • by MickyTheIdiot ( 1032226 ) on Thursday March 17, 2011 @06:11AM (#35514096) Homepage Journal

    Children as seen as a commodity and chattel in the U.S. I know this will get modded as "Troll" or something, but it has to be said. We don't really see children as human in the U.S. We certainly don't treat them as humans. Even in this thread you can see people see "teenagers" as a totally other species.

  • by Neil Boekend ( 1854906 ) on Thursday March 17, 2011 @06:17AM (#35514118)
    Then again: letting kids choose not to go to school has to great a chance to have them go to crime or welfare once they are grown up. The autodidacts are a small group compared to the kids who would crash without school (and thus we should first be considerate of the greater group). It's sad they cannot function to their greatest potential, but sacrifices have to be made assuming you want to let all kids go to the same school.
    If you'd have the autodidacts go to a Montessori school (I only know it from my education, I haven't been to one myself) you could have them blossom to their maximum capacity, but normal kid's can't function in a Montessori school.
  • Re:Ludicrous (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Hazel Bergeron ( 2015538 ) on Thursday March 17, 2011 @06:57AM (#35514310) Journal

    What does that have to do with not being offended by mere words and responding to the situation logically?

    How do you logically respond to Hitler? Do you note that he has not killed anyone with his own hands and ask him nicely to step aside for a friendly chat? If he ignores you, do you just shrug and let him carry on? Do you tell his victims that he's an insane little man and that, if you're not standing up to him, you're just weak?

    Most verbal bullies aren't powerful because they call you names. They're powerful because they influence others' behaviour toward their victim. If you take aside the grunt who throws the punch, you're not solving the problem - you're removing a symptom.

    The US seems to fail to understand this in foreign policy, too. Contrast how the IRA has been neutered and ETA more recently tackled.

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...