Scott Adams Says Plenty Would Choose Life In Noprivacyville 467
LoLobey writes "On the other end of the spectrum from Richard Stallman, Scott Adams (of Dilbert fame) speculates upon the advantages of living in a town with no privacy whatsoever. Everyone gets chipped and tracked online. 'Although you would never live in a city without privacy, I think that if one could save 30% on basic living expenses, and live in a relatively crime-free area, plenty of volunteers would come forward.'"
What 30%? (Score:4, Informative)
I think Scott is over estimating the discount needed to get a large group of volunteers to move to Fishbowlville.
Thought experiment (Score:4, Informative)
Before everybody get's their panties in a bunch, the key line from TFA is this:
So don't take it too seriously. Scott Adams isn't proposing this as a good idea, attacking your privacy or making excuses for attacking your privacy. He set up a premise and explored what he thinks the consequences might be. You can disagree with his conclusions, but try and keep some perspective.