A Spamming Attorney Gets Sentenced To 40 Months 131
www.sorehands.com writes "While one spammer, Robert Soloway, gets released on probation, the Feds send another, Robert Smoley, to the slammer for 40 months.
I know about Smoley because I tracked him down, and beat him in court. Not only was he an attorney, he still has not lost his license, yet. The IRS contacted me as a result of seeing my web site, and I gladly assisted the IRS in tracking his business. He not only bounced a check on me, but stiffed his local counsel and one of his ISPs."
Re:Spamming attorney Vs. IRS (Score:4, Insightful)
Spamming attorney is doing it because he's the unethical shit breaking the law.
IRS - collecting on behalf of Congress who can never ever live within their means - even when they use Hollywood bookkeeping to "balance" the budget.
The attorney is the shit here.
Any problems with the IRS you'd have to blame Congress for.
Re:Not for spamming (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, the headline on Slashdot would tend to elicit rightful cries of "Is spamming a 'crime' worthy of taking several percent of someone's entire life span?", while the real article would elicit rightful responses of "Okay, so the guy was found guilty of running a prescription drug sales scam online".
Someone really needs to vet the sanity of articles before they make Slashdot, but after almost fifteen years, why start now?
Re:Spam action doesn't get less useful (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Spamming attorney Vs. IRS (Score:2, Insightful)
You should not be. One spamming attorney avoiding paying taxes to the tune of millions means everyone else gets to pay more taxes to make up the difference.
Re:Not for spamming (Score:2, Insightful)
So if you add up everyone who facepalmed after reading that post, the collected force would crush someone's skull, so clearly you should be going down for murder as well.
Re:Spam action doesn't get less useful (Score:0, Insightful)