Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Patents Technology Your Rights Online

DOJ Anti-trust Investigation of MPEG-LA 149

Posted by Unknown Lamer
from the pay-the-fees-or-else dept.
thomst writes "The Wall Street Journal's Thomas Catan reports that the Department of Justice has launched an anti-trust investigation of MPEG-LA's purported efforts to prevent Google's VP8 codec from widespread adoption. According to the article, the California Stare Attorney General's office is also investigating MPEG-LA for possible restraint of trade practices."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

DOJ Anti-trust Investigation of MPEG-LA

Comments Filter:
  • Re:yea! (Score:2, Interesting)

    by DJRumpy (1345787) on Friday March 04, 2011 @12:10PM (#35380190)

    Except there is no price being discussed. The article sums it up nicely at the end:

    "All video codecs are covered by patents," Mr. Jobs wrote. "Unfortunately, just because something is open-source, it doesn't mean or guarantee that it doesn't infringe on others patents."

    If MPEG-LA believes that VP8 infringes, then they are well within their rights to question it. The OpenSource folks, of which slashdot has a majority, seem to think that all patents are evil. I tend to think both sides have merit, and neither would do well without the other. If Google believes that simply questioning whether or not a patent infringes is anti-competitive, then they have a long road to haul. That said, it does seem like MPEG-LA is dragging this out longer than necessary. Although it's conceivable that they could still be gathering information at this stage, surely they have enough preliminary data at this point to make a legal case (or not).

    I suspect this latest bruhaha is just to put pressure on MPEG-LA to put up or shut up.

"One Architecture, One OS" also translates as "One Egg, One Basket".