Data Retention Should Last One Year, US Gov't Tells Australia 98
mask.of.sanity writes "The United States and Australia will enter bilateral talks in an attempt to unify controversial policies that would force internet providers to retain logs on the online habits of citizens. The US has urged Australia to take a moderate approach as it drafts its legislation and said it should not keep logs for longer than a year. Some EU nations keep the logs for as long as five years, although European nations disagree over the need for the plan." And of course, that's also how long we should keep recordings of everyone's phone calls, and copies of their (opened) mail, too.
Here's the map.. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:How about this? (Score:3, Informative)
The headline was written to troll you. The Australian government's position is already the same as that of the United States; the quote from the Australian attorney general shows him citing the United States as an ally in the fight against excessive data retention periods. There's nothing except that bad headline to indicate some sort of policy incursion by the US.
I work in the field of data protection (Score:4, Informative)
...and let me tell you, one-year retention is EXPENSIVE. It kinda makes me laugh at the politicians who demand things like this, while they have no idea what such a system entails. Maybe the Australian gov't was planning on financing the tape libraries required to hold the PBs of logs generated every month by Australian citizens?
Re:A bit of a problem, for anyone named "Bruce" (Score:2, Informative)
quaff down your Foster's.
You are obviously not Australian!
Fosters - the beer Australians wont drink
Re:A bit of a problem, for anyone named "Bruce" (Score:5, Informative)
Re:This is bullshit (Score:2, Informative)
He can't, voting is mandatory in Australia.
Unless you're an ex-pat, of course. ;-)