Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship Communications Government The Media Your Rights Online Politics

Egyptians Turn To Tor To Organize Dissent Online 152

An anonymous reader writes "Even as President Obama prepares to follow Mubarak with his own 'internet kill switch', Egyptians were turning to the Tor anonymiser to organise their protests online. The number of Egyptians connecting to the internet over Tor rose more than five-fold after protests broke out last week before crashing when the Government severed links to the global internet. Information security researcher, Tor coder and writer of the bridge that allowed Egypt's citizens to short-circuit government filters, Jacob Appelbaum, told SC Magazine Egyptians were 'concerned and some understand the risk of network traffic analysis.' Appelbaum has himself been the subject of attention from US security services who routinely snatch his electronics and search his belongings when he re-enters the country and who subpoenaed his private Twitter account last December." Which helps explain why Appelbaum is helping to organize a small fundraiser to get more communications gear into Egypt.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Egyptians Turn To Tor To Organize Dissent Online

Comments Filter:
  • Net kill switch (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 02, 2011 @12:08AM (#35076524)

    I see people always going on about that. I can't see how this would help in the US. If people were protesting or there was unrest in the US, hitting the net kill switch would be economic suicide. In Egypt and Tunisia, the net was used more for socializing than business. In the US, the bulk of net use (in pure data) is business related. Our entire economy runs off of the net now. Turning it off would shut down or severely hobble a large number of fortune 500 companies, not to mention thousands of small and medium sized businesses. Also, like in Egypt and Tunisia, it would just give people more reason to go out on the streets. Without the net to bitch about the state of the country/world on, they would turn to going outside and raising hell instead. So sure, the govt can build their kill switch, but only if they plan to jettison our economy with the push oa button.

  • Re:Net kill switch (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 02, 2011 @12:43AM (#35076706)

    YouTube, Netflix, porn... all businesses.

  • Re:I'm Confused (Score:2, Interesting)

    by JWSmythe ( 446288 ) <jwsmytheNO@SPAMjwsmythe.com> on Wednesday February 02, 2011 @12:54AM (#35076760) Homepage Journal

    ... Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes ...

        How far does the information have to travel, to get to the nearest border? About 250 miles. Less, if there's a point to point wireless relay. Sure, the "Internet" may be disabled. So all the fiber coming in country may be disabled. So all the ISP's may have downed their uplink interfaces. That doesn't mean an uplink isn't a tower climb away.

        Then again, I wouldn't want to be the guy climbing a tower to set up an uplink directly against the government's will, in the middle of a freakin' revolution. It's either a way to find out what the real effective of a MPK (or M16, or M4, or M40A3, or M21, or M1A2, or T55E, or... or .... or... damn, they have a huge variety of weapons). Shot off a tower, or a tower shot out from under you. Neither sounds like a very good option. Twitter wouldn't seem to be the highest priority during combat.

  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2011 @01:42AM (#35076984)
    but the rest of the world riots for real. China keeps their populace in line with shear brutality, but Egypt is connected to other countries enough that isn't an option (they're also not powerful enough to resist being "liberated").

    Basically, it's only dumb, Fox news lovin' Americans that can be fooled so easily. Mostly because Americans have had 60+ years of indoctrination that's crushed any sense of entitlement and turned us into a nation of abused housewives that always blame ourselves ("The reason I lost my job, car, home, everything was I just didn't work hard enough, it's got nothing to do with H1-B visas, whatever those are!"). Even when Americans accept entitlements they don't feel it's right, and they've got to be tricked into it. Ayn Rand had to be talked into it at the end of her life (medicare/Social Security) so she wasn't homeless, and there's legions of dummy's marching in anti-socialized medicine parades on their Medicare provided scooters. They've got no idea.
  • by metacell ( 523607 ) on Wednesday February 02, 2011 @06:59AM (#35078164)

    For a European like me, the difference between Democratic and Republican presidents seems minimal with regards to electronic surveillance and censorship.

    In my own country, Sweden, the parties conveniently switch to criticising surveillance and censorship when they're out of power, only to conveniently switch back when they're in power again.

"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker

Working...